Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Construction Project Costs and Overruns Using a Comparative Study of Benchmark Datasets
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59992/IJCI.2026.v5n9p1الكلمات المفتاحية:
Machine Learning، Construction Management، Cost Prediction، Schedule Delay، Cost Overrun، XGBoost، SHAP، Engineering Managementالملخص
A common failure in construction project delivery around the world is cost overruns and schedule delays. This research benchmarks five machine learning models (Random Forest (RF), Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM), Support Vector Machine (SVM), and a Multilayer Perceptron Artificial Neural Network (ANN)) on two public benchmark datasets, under a single unified protocol: (1) the UCI Residential Building Data Set consisting of 107 predictors and 372 projects for construction cost and sales price prediction, and (2) 2,590 project-phase records from the New York City (NYC) Open Data portal, for time and cost overrun prediction and delay-risk classification. All models were tuned by randomized search with 5-fold cross-validation and evaluated on held-out test sets, and the best models were interpreted using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP). XGBoost achieved the best cost-prediction performance on the UCI benchmark (R² = 0.978, MAPE = 8.74%), exceeding recently published results, with SHAP attributing predictions primarily to the preliminary cost estimate, construction duration, and lagged macro-economic indices. On the NYC data, point regression of overrun magnitude from administrative features alone proved weak (best R² = 0.32), whereas binary delay-risk classification was strong (LightGBM F1 = 0.734, AUC = 0.829) on a nearly balanced sample, matching or exceeding prior questionnaire-based delay classifiers. The findings indicate that gradient-boosted ensembles are the most robust default for heterogeneous construction data, and that machine learning can already serve as an effective delay-triage tool using routinely archived administrative records — a practice directly transferable to public project governance in developing contexts such as Iraq.
المراجع
1. Office of the New York State Comptroller, "Better Reporting and Monitoring of NYC Capital Projects Needed," Albany, NY, USA, Apr. 2024.
2. Z. M. Yaseen, Z. H. Ali, S. Q. Salih, and N. Al-Ansari, "Prediction of risk delay in construction projects using a hybrid artificial intelligence model," Sustainability, vol. 12, no. 4, p. 1514, 2020, doi: 10.3390/su12041514.
3. R. Hamdan et al., "Predicting cost overrun in construction projects using machine learning algorithms: the case of Jordan," Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, vol. 33, no. 6, 2025, doi: 10.1108/ecam-09-2024-1209.
4. O. Alshboul, A. Shehadeh, G. Almasabha, and A. S. Almuflih, "Extreme gradient boosting-based machine learning approach for green building cost prediction," Sustainability, vol. 14, no. 11, p. 6651, 2022, doi: 10.3390/su14116651.
5. A. Gondia, A. Siam, W. El-Dakhakhni, and A. H. Nassar, "Machine learning algorithms for construction projects delay risk prediction," Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, vol. 146, no. 1, p. 04019085, 2020, doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001736.
6. A. Asadi, M. Alsubaey, and C. Makatsoris, "A machine learning approach for predicting delays in construction logistics," International Journal of Advanced Logistics, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 115–130, 2015.
7. S. Alsulamy, "Predicting construction delay risks in Saudi Arabian projects: A comparative analysis of CatBoost, XGBoost, and LGBM," Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 268, p. 126268, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2024.126268.
8. F. Mostofi et al., "Cost overrun risk assessment and prediction in construction projects: A Bayesian network classifier approach," Buildings, vol. 12, no. 10, p. 1660, 2022, doi: 10.3390/buildings12101660.
9. R. Al mnaseer, S. Al-Smadi, and H. Al-Bdour, "Machine learning-aided time and cost overrun prediction in construction projects: application of artificial neural network," Asian Journal of Civil Engineering, vol. 24, no. 7, pp. 2583–2593, 2023, doi: 10.1007/s42107-023-00665-7.
10. C. Emmanuel et al., "Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Precepts, methods, and opportunities for research in construction," arXiv: 2211.06579, 2022.
11. G. Coffie and S. Cudjoe, "Using extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) machine learning to predict construction cost overruns," International Journal of Construction Management, vol. 24, no. 16, pp. 1742–1750, 2024, doi: 10.1080/15623599.2023.2289754.
12. Y. Tian, Y. Chen, and Y. Ning, "Identifying and predicting delay risks in prefabricated construction: an explainable ensemble learning approach," Advanced Engineering Informatics, 2026, doi: 10.1016/j.aei.2025.104219.
13. R. Shyam and S. Tiwari, "Predictive assessment of construction delays on schedule, cost, and quality performance using machine learning and multi-criteria decision analysis," Journal of The Institution of Engineers (India): Series A, 2026, doi: 10.1007/s40030-026-00989-y.
14. M. Rafiei, "Residential Building [Dataset]," UCI Machine Learning Repository, 2015, doi: 10.24432/C5S896.
15. M. H. Rafiei and H. Adeli, "Novel machine-learning model for estimating construction costs considering economic variables and indexes," Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, vol. 144, no. 12, 2018, doi: 10.1061/ (ASCE) CO.1943-7862.0001570.
16. A. El-Kholy, "Exploring the best ANN model based on four paradigms to predict delay and cost overrun percentages of highway projects," International Journal of Construction Management, vol. 21, no. 7, pp. 694–712, 2021, doi: 10.1080/15623599.2019.1580001.
17. F. Zawaideh, "BIM-integrated explainable machine learning for cost, schedule, and carbon risk prediction in high-rise building construction," Asian Journal of Civil Engineering, 2026, doi: 10.1007/s42107-026-01761-0.
18. "Transparent and reliable construction cost prediction using advanced machine learning and explainable AI," 2025 (Science Direct, in press).
19. Z. H. Ali et al., "Developing an integrative data intelligence model for construction cost estimation," Complexity, vol. 2022, p. 4285328, 2022, doi: 10.1155/2022/4285328.
20. R. N. Zehawi, "Prediction and estimation of highway construction cost using machine learning," Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 17222–17231, 2024, doi: 10.48084/etasr.8285.
21. B. A. Kamil, "An empirical evaluation of the performance of deep neural networks on delay risk prediction in urban flexible pavement projects in Iraq," Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 28343–28349, 2025, doi: 10.48084/etasr.13781.
22. NYC Open Data, "Capital Project Schedules and Budgets," dataset 2xh6-psuq, City of New York.
23. S. M. Lundberg and S.-I. Lee, "A unified approach to interpreting model predictions," in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 30 (NeurIPS), 2017, pp. 4765–4774.