Analysis of the Study Cybersecurity Awareness for Hauman-Centered Protection Model in System Environments and Users Behavior
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59992/IJCI.2025.v4n12p1الكلمات المفتاحية:
Cybersecurity Awareness Training، Innovative Model، Micro-Learning Module، Cognitive Load، Bias Heuristics، Risk Communication، Health Modelsالملخص
This paper explores the critical role of human behavior in cybersecurity vulnerabilities, emphasizing the psychological and social factors that influence decision- making at individual and organizational levels. Therefore, research directions in emerging technologies, behavioral analytics, and immersive community, in hold educational technologies. In the others side factors’ addressing human-centric vulnerabilities, research aims to mitigate human error-driven from social digital resilience impact, across of the organizational domains. We describe why incorporating an understanding of human behavior into cyber security products and processes can lead to more effective technology. And the other illustrates how behavioral science offers the potential for significant increases in the effectiveness of cyber security. Based on feedback collected through electronic questionnaire that was distributed via social media applications form. The results, its shed light analyzing on the substantial contribution of understanding user behavior, and cognitive processes for to development of tailored cybersecurity strategies. The challenges, such as security fatigue and the scarcity of advocating for human factors engineering and strategic initiatives, leads us to develop human- centric paradigm in the next extension phase based on these results. However, we can develop and gives embracing a human-centric paradigm against dynamic and sophisticated cyber threats, by providing a model of awareness technologies training behavior cybersecurity shield of the protection availabilities.
المراجع
1. Carter, W.A. (2017). Forces shaping the cyber threat landscape for financial institutions. SWIFT Institute Working Paper No. 2016-004, October 2, 2017. Retrievedfromhttps://csisprod.s3.amazonaws.com/s3fspublic/171006_Cyber_Threat_Landscape%20_Carter.
2. Bureau, S. (2018). Human-centered cybersecurity: A new approach to securing networks. Research at RIT. Rochester Institute of Technology Research Report, Fall/Winter 2017-2018. [DOI: Not available].
3. Fazil, A. W., Hakimi, M., Sajid, S., Quchi, M. M., & Khaliqyar, K. Q. (2023). Enhancing Internet Safety and Cybersecurity Awareness among Secondary and High School Students in fghanistan: A Case Study of Badakhshan Province. American Journal of Education. Aand Tec.
4. hnology, 2(4), 50–61. https://doi.org/10.54536/ajet.v2i4.2248, Nobles, C. (2018). Botching human factors in cybersecurity in business organizations. HOLISTICA–Journal of Business and Public Administration, 9(3), 71-88. doi:10.2478/hjbpa-2018-0024 [DOI: Not available]
5. Hakimi, M., Ahmady, E., Shahidzay, A. K., Fazil, A. W., Quchi, M. M., & Akbari, R. (2023). Securing Cyberspace: Exploring the Efficacy of SVM (Poly, Sigmoid) and ANN inMalware Analysis. Cognizance Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies, 3(12), 199-208.
6. Hasas, A., Zarinkhail, M. S., Hakimi, M., & Quchi, M. M. (2024). Strengthening DigitalSecurity: Dynamic Attack Detection with LSTM, KNN, and Random Forest. Journal ofComputer Science and Technology Studies, 6(1), 49–57.
7. Bicanic S, Brahm C, Bre C (2020) What to do now that your demand forecast is wrong. Bain & Co. https:// www. bain. com/ insig hts/ what- to- do- when- your- demand- forec ast- is- wrong/. Accessed 6Apr 2020
8. Addae JH, Sun X, Towey D, Radenkovic M (2019) Exploring user behavioral data for adaptive cybersecurity. User ModelUser-Adap Inter 29(3):701–750. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/s11257- 019- 09236-5
9. Huang, B. (2024). Navigating Digital Divide: Exploring the Influence of Ideological and Political Education on Cyber Security and Digital Literacy Amid Information Warfare.
10. Current Psychology, 43, 23815-23836. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-024-06106-1Aksoy, C. (2024). Building a Cyber Security Culture for Resilient Organizations againstCyber Attacks. İşletme Ekonomi ve Yönetim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 7, 96-110.https://doi.org/10.33416/baybem.1374001
11. Albladi & Weir (2020) ource: SpringerOpen – Journal of CybersecuritySStudyink: How User Behavior Shapes Cybersecurity Awareness in the Face of Phishing Attacks
12. Authors: Kuraku et al. (2023) Source: International Journal of Computer Trends and Technology (IJCTT)Study link: https://www.ijcttjournal.org/archives/ijctt-v71i11p111
13. Authors: Moustafa et al. (2021), “The Role of User Behaviour in Improving Cyber Security Management” Source: linkhttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34220596
14. Authors: Bada et al. (2019), Source: arXiv (Cornell University) Study link: https://arxiv.org/abs/1901.02672
15. Authors: Wilcox & Bhattacharya, “A Human Dimension of Hacking: Social Engineering through Social Media” (2020), Source: arXiv.
16. Authors: Haycock & Matthews,” Review and insight on the behavioral aspects of cybersecurity” (2020) Source: SpringerOpen – Journal of Cybersecurity.
