Ethical Dimensions and Issues of Artificial Intelligence Applications in Education: A PRISMA-Informed Systematic Literature Review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59992/IJESA.2026.v5n6p1الكلمات المفتاحية:
Artificial Intelligence in Education، Educational Ethics، Generative AI، Data Privacy، Algorithmic Bias، Academic Integrity، AI Governance، Learner Agency، PRISMAالملخص
Background. Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly embedded across K–12 and higher education for assessment, tutoring, feedback, predictive analytics, student support, content generation, and institutional decision-making. The rapid diffusion of generative AI has compressed adoption timelines and intensified pre-existing ethical debates surrounding privacy, fairness, transparency, accountability, learner agency, and academic integrity.
Objective. This PRISMA-informed systematic literature review synthesizes recent peer-reviewed scholarship and policy-oriented evidence concerning the ethical dimensions of AI applications in education, with particular emphasis on the 2023–2025 period.
Methods. The review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA 2020 reporting framework. Predefined review questions, eligibility criteria, a reproducible search-string template, a screening protocol, and a thematic synthesis approach were applied. Searches drew on Scopus, Web of Science, ERIC, IEEE Xplore, ACM Digital Library, ScienceDirect, and SpringerLink, supplemented by policy literature from UNESCO, the OECD, and the European Union. A thematic synthesis was conducted across recurring ethical domains, and a quality-appraisal plan suited to the heterogeneity of the corpus was specified.
Results. Six interdependent ethical domains were consistently identified across the corpus: (1) privacy and surveillance; (2) fairness, bias, and inclusion; (3) transparency and explainability; (4) accountability and governance; (5) learner and educator agency; and (6) academic integrity. Five cross-cutting tensions characterize the field: personalization versus surveillance, efficiency versus pedagogical autonomy, innovation versus fairness, automation versus accountability, and assistance versus integrity. Persistent gaps include limited longitudinal and comparative empirical work, underrepresentation of K–12 and Global South contexts, insufficient attention to procurement and platform governance, and a tendency to treat heterogeneous AI technologies as interchangeable.
Conclusions. Ethical AI in education should be conceptualized not only as a technical design problem but also as a pedagogical, institutional, and sociopolitical challenge. Responsible adoption requires participatory governance, transparent procurement, meaningful human oversight, redesigned assessment, and context-sensitive policy. Future research should prioritize longitudinal and implementation-focused studies, technology-specific risk–benefit assessment, and stronger representation of underrepresented educational contexts.
المراجع
• Ab Rahman, N. F., Wang, S. L., Ng, T. F., & Ghoneim, A. S. (2024). Artificial intelligence in education: A systematic review of machine learning for predicting student performance. Journal of Advanced Research in Applied Sciences and Engineering Technology, 54(1), 198–221. https://doi.org/10.37934/araset.54.1.198221
• Adamakis, M., & Rachiotis, T. (2025). Artificial intelligence in higher education: A state-of-the-art overview of pedagogical integrity, artificial intelligence literacy, and policy integration. Encyclopedia, 5(4), 180. https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia5040180
• Alali, R., & Wardat, Y. (2024). Opportunities and challenges of integrating generative artificial intelligence in education. International Journal of Religion, 5(7), 784–793. https://doi.org/10.61707/8y29gv34
• Berson, I. R., Berson, M. J., & Luo, W. (2025). Innovating responsibly: Ethical considerations for AI in early childhood education. AI, Brain and Child, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44436-025-00003-5
• Bogina, V., Hartman, A., Kuflik, T., & Shulner-Tal, A. (2021). Educating software and AI stakeholders about algorithmic fairness, accountability, transparency and ethics. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 32(3), 808–833. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-021-00248-0
• Bulut, O., & Beiting-Parrish, M. (2024). The rise of artificial intelligence in educational measurement: Opportunities and ethical challenges. Chinese/English Journal of Educational Measurement and Evaluation, 5(3). https://doi.org/10.59863/miql7785
• Bura, C., Jonnalagadda, A. K., & Naayini, P. (2025). The role of explainable AI (XAI) in trust and adoption. Journal of Artificial Intelligence General Science (JAIGS), 7(1), 262–277. https://doi.org/10.60087/jaigs.v7i01.331
• Buragohain, D., & Chaudhary, S. (2025). Navigating ChatGPT in ASEAN higher education: Ethical and pedagogical perspectives. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 33(4). https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.70062
• Chan, C. K. Y. (2024). Students’ perceptions of ‘AI-giarism’: Investigating changes in understandings of academic misconduct. Education and Information Technologies, 30(6), 8087–8108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-13151-7
• Chaudhry, M. A., Cukurova, M., & Luckin, R. (2022). A transparency index framework for AI in education. Center for Open Science. https://doi.org/10.35542/osf.io/bstcf
• Chun, J., Kim, J., Kim, H., Lee, G., Cho, S., Kim, C., Chung, Y., & Heo, S. (2025). A comparative analysis of on-device AI-driven, self-regulated learning and traditional pedagogy in university health sciences education. Applied Sciences, 15(4), 1815. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15041815
• Costa, K., Mfolo, L. N., & Ntsobi, M. P. (2024). Challenges, benefits and recommendations for using generative artificial intelligence in academic writing—A case of ChatGPT. Center for Open Science. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/7hr5v
• De Fine Licht, K., & De Fine Licht, J. (2020). Artificial intelligence, transparency, and public decision-making. AI & Society, 35(4), 917–926. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-020-00960-w
• Duan, H., & Zhao, W. (2024). The effects of educational artificial intelligence-powered applications on teachers’ perceived autonomy, professional development for online teaching, and digital burnout. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 25(3), 57–76. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v25i3.7659
• Eden, C., Chisom, O., & Adeniyi, I. (2024). Integrating AI in education: Opportunities, challenges, and ethical considerations. Magna Scientia Advanced Research and Reviews, 10(2), 6–13. https://doi.org/10.30574/msarr.2024.10.2.0039
• European Parliament and Council of the European Union. (2024). Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act). Official Journal of the European Union.
• Feldstein, S. (2023). Evaluating Europe’s push to enact AI regulations: How will this influence global norms? Democratization, 31(5), 1049–1066.
https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2023.2196068
• Feretzakis, G., Papaspyridis, K., Gkoulalas-Divanis, A., & Verykios, V. S. (2024). Privacy-preserving techniques in generative AI and large language models: A narrative review. Information, 15(11), 697. https://doi.org/10.3390/info15110697
• Fu, Y., & Weng, Z. (2024). Navigating the ethical terrain of AI in education: A systematic review on framing responsible human-centered AI practices. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 7, 100306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100306
• Gardezi, M., Joshi, B., Rizzo, D. M., Ryan, M., Prutzer, E., Brugler, S., & Dadkhah, A. (2023). Artificial intelligence: A useful analogy for explainable AI. Agronomy Journal, 116(3), 1217–1228. https://doi.org/10.1002/agj2.21353
• Ghose, A., Ali, S. M. A., & Mishra, A. M. (2024). Artistic expressions, generative AI, and legal tapestry (pp. 198–214). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-1950-5.ch011
• Gore, S., & Dove, E. (2024). Ethical considerations in the use of artificial intelligence in counselling and psychotherapy training: A student stakeholder perspective—A pilot study. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 25(1). https://doi.org/10.1002/capr.12770
• Igbokwe, I. C. (2024). Artificial intelligence in educational leadership: Risks and responsibilities. European Journal of Arts, Humanities and Social Sciences, 1(6), 3–10.
https://doi.org/10.59324/ejahss.2024.1(6).01
• Jauhiainen, J. S., & Guerra, A. G. (2023). Generative AI and ChatGPT in school children’s education: Evidence from a school lesson. Sustainability, 15(18), 14025.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su151814025
• Javed, F. (2024). The evolution of artificial intelligence in teaching and learning of English language in higher education: Challenges, risks, and ethical considerations (pp. 249–276). Emerald. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-83549-486-820241015
• Jose, D. (2024). Data privacy and security concerns in AI-integrated educational platforms. Recent Trends in Management and Commerce, 5(2), 87–91. https://doi.org/10.46632/rmc/5/2/19
• Kadaruddin, K. (2023). Empowering education through generative AI: Innovative instructional strategies for tomorrow’s learners. International Journal of Business, Law, and Education, 4(2), 618–625. https://doi.org/10.56442/ijble.v4i2.215
• Kalinichenko, O., & Griban, G. (2025). Theoretical foundations of using artificial intelligence technologies in physical education of high school students. Scientific Journal of National Pedagogical Dragomanov University, Series 15, 11(198), 74–77. https://doi.org/10.31392/udu-nc.series15.2025.11(198).14
• Kohnke, S., & Zaugg, T. (2025). Artificial intelligence: An untapped opportunity for equity and access in STEM education. Education Sciences, 15(1), 68.
https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15010068
• Kotsis, K. T. (2025). From potential to practice: Rethinking STEM education through artificial intelligence. International Journal of Advanced Multidisciplinary Research and Studies, 5(5), 613–617. https://doi.org/10.62225/2583049x.2025.5.5.4972
• Lee, S. S., & Moore, R. L. (2024). Harnessing generative AI (GenAI) for automated feedback in higher education: A systematic review. Online Learning, 28(3).
https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v28i3.4593
• Li, Z. (2024). AI ethics and transparency in operations management: How governance mechanisms can reduce data bias and privacy risks. Journal of Applied Economics and Policy Studies, 13(1), 89–93. https://doi.org/10.54254/2977-5701/13/2024130
• Lin, H., & Chen, Q. (2024). Artificial intelligence (AI)-integrated educational applications and college students’ creativity and academic emotions: Students’ and teachers’ perceptions and attitudes. BMC Psychology, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-024-01979-0
• Lockwood, A., & Brown, J. (2024). Mitigating AI bias in school psychology: Toward equitable and ethical implementation. Center for Open Science. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/mh4rj
• Mahmoud, C. F., & Sørensen, J. T. (2024). Artificial intelligence in personalized learning with a focus on current developments and future prospects. Research and Advances in Education, 3(8), 25–31. https://doi.org/10.56397/rae.2024.08.04
• Maluleke, A. F. (2025). AI adoption in African higher education: A systematic review of benefits and ethical implications. Interdisciplinary Journal of Education Research, 7(2), a05. https://doi.org/10.38140/ijer-2025.vol7.2.05
• Miao, F., & Holmes, W. (2023). Guidance for generative AI in education and research. UNESCO.
• Mishra, I., Kashyap, V., Yadav, N., & Pahwa, D. (2024). Harmonizing intelligence: A holistic approach to bias mitigation in artificial intelligence (AI). International Research Journal on Advanced Engineering Hub, 2(7), 1978–1985. https://doi.org/10.47392/irjaeh.2024.0270
• Mouta, A., Pinto-Llorente, A. M., & Torrecilla-Sánchez, E. M. (2024). Uncovering blind spots in education ethics: Insights from a systematic literature review on artificial intelligence in education. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 34, 1166–1205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-023-00384-9
• Mustofa, H. A., Kola, A. J., & Owusu-Darko, I. (2025). Integration of artificial intelligence (ChatGPT) into science teaching and learning. International Journal of Ethnoscience and Technology in Education, 2(1), 108. https://doi.org/10.33394/ijete.v2i1.14195
• Nikolic, S., Wentworth, I., Sheridan, L., Moss, S., Duursma, E., Jones, R. A., Ros, M., & Middleton, R. (2024). A systematic literature review of attitudes, intentions and behaviours of teaching academics pertaining to AI and generative AI (GenAI) in higher education: An analysis of GenAI adoption using the UTAUT framework. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.9643
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2019, updated 2024). Recommendation of the Council on Artificial Intelligence. OECD Legal Instruments.
• Özer, M. (2024). Potential benefits and risks of artificial intelligence in education. Bartın Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 13(2), 232–244. https://doi.org/10.14686/buefad.1416087
• Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., et al. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
• Pashaie, S., Mohammadi, S., & Golmohammadi, H. (2024). Unlocking athlete potential: The evolution of coaching strategies through artificial intelligence. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part P: Journal of Sports Engineering and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1177/17543371241300889
• Peng, J., & Li, Y. (2025). Frontiers of artificial intelligence for personalized learning in higher education: A systematic review of leading articles. Applied Sciences, 15(18), 10096. https://doi.org/10.3390/app151810096
• Rane, N. (2024). Enhancing the quality of teaching and learning through ChatGPT and similar large language models: Challenges, future prospects, and ethical considerations in education. TESOL and Technology Studies, 5(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.48185/tts.v5i1.1000
• Rane, N., Shirke, S., Choudhary, S. P., & Rane, J. (2024). Education strategies for promoting academic integrity in the era of artificial intelligence and ChatGPT: Ethical considerations, challenges, policies, and future directions. Journal of ELT Studies, 1(1).
https://doi.org/10.48185/jes.v1i1.1314
• Routray, R., & Khandelwal, K. (2024). Artificial intelligence (AI) adoption: Do Generation Z students feel technostress in deploying AI for completing courses of study at universities? Asian Education and Development Studies, 13(5), 534–545. https://doi.org/10.1108/aeds-06-2024-0115
• Sánchez, E., Aguilar, P., Hidalgo, A., Ramírez, A., Hidalgo, J., & Guamán, E. (2025). Artificial intelligence for inclusive classrooms transforming learning through innovation and digital equity. Revista Multidisciplinar de Estudios Generales, 4(4), 595–615.
https://doi.org/10.70577/reg.v4i4.322
• Schönberger, M. (2024). Integrating artificial intelligence in higher education: Enhancing interactive learning experiences and student engagement through ChatGPT (pp. 11–34). Emerald. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-83549-486-820241002
• Selvam, M., & González Vallejo, R. (2025). Ethical and privacy considerations in AI-driven language learning. LatIA, 3, 328. https://doi.org/10.62486/latia2025328
• Silva, G., Godwin, G., & Jayanagara, O. (2024). The impact of AI on personalized learning and educational analytics. International Transactions on Education Technology, 3(1), 36–46. https://doi.org/10.33050/itee.v3i1.669
• Slimi, Z., & Villarejo Carballido, B. (2023). Navigating the ethical challenges of artificial intelligence in higher education: An analysis of seven global AI ethics policies. TEM Journal, 12(2), 590–602. https://doi.org/10.18421/tem122-02
• Song, N. (2024). Higher education crisis: Academic misconduct with generative AI. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 32(1). https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5973.12532
• Taşkın, M. (2025). Artificial intelligence in personalized education: Enhancing learning outcomes through adaptive technologies and data-driven insights. Human Computer Interaction, 8(1), 173. https://doi.org/10.62802/ygye0506
• Thurzo, A. (2025). Provable AI ethics and explainability in next-generation medical and educational AI agents: Trustworthy ethical firewall. MDPI AG.
https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202502.2232.v1
• Ünlü, S. C. (2024). Enhancing user experience through AI-driven personalization in user interfaces. Human Computer Interaction, 8(1), 19. https://doi.org/10.62802/m7mqmb52
• Valerio, A. S. (2024). Anticipating the impact of artificial intelligence in higher education: Student awareness and ethical concerns in Zamboanga City, Philippines. Cognizance Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies, 4(6), 408–418. https://doi.org/10.47760/cognizance.2024.v04i06.024
• Vatankhah, S., Bamshad, V., Arici, H. E., & Duan, Y. (2024). Ethical implementation of artificial intelligence in the service industries. The Service Industries Journal, 44(9–10), 661–685. https://doi.org/10.1080/02642069.2024.2359077
• Vieriu, A. M., & Petrea, G. (2025). The impact of artificial intelligence (AI) on students’ academic development. Education Sciences, 15(3), 343. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15030343
• Wang, K., Cui, W., & Yuan, X. (2025). Artificial intelligence in higher education: The impact of need satisfaction on artificial intelligence literacy mediated by self-regulated learning strategies. Behavioral Sciences, 15(2), 165. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15020165
• Weber-Wulff, D., Anohina-Naumeca, A., Bjelobaba, S., Foltýnek, T., Guerrero-Dib, J., Popoola, O., Šigut, P., & Waddington, L. (2023). Testing of detection tools for AI-generated text. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-023-00146-z
• Wieczorek, M., Hosseini, M., & Gordijn, B. (2025). Unpacking the ethics of using AI in primary and secondary education: A systematic literature review. AI and Ethics, 5, 4693–4711. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-025-00770-0
• Wirzal, M. D. H., Md Nordin, N. A. H., Abd Halim, N. S., & Bustam, M. A. (2024). Generative AI in science education: A learning revolution or a threat to academic integrity? A bibliometric analysis. Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengkajian Ilmu Pendidikan: E-Saintika, 8(3), 319–351. https://doi.org/10.36312/e-saintika.v8i3.2127
• Wu, D., Zhang, S., Ma, Z., Yue, X.-G., & Dong, R. K. (2024). Unlocking potential: Key factors shaping undergraduate self-directed learning in AI-enhanced educational environments. Systems, 12(9), 332. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems12090332
• Xue, Y., Chinapah, V., & Zhu, C. (2025). A comparative analysis of AI privacy concerns in higher education: News coverage in China and Western countries. Education Sciences, 15(6), 650. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15060650
• Yambal, S., & Waykar, Y. A. (2025). Future of education using adaptive AI, intelligent systems, and ethical challenges (pp. 171–202). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-6527-4.ch006
• Yan, Y., Liu, H., & Chau, T. (2025). A systematic review of AI ethics in education: Challenges, policy gaps, and future directions. Journal of Global Information Management, 33(1), 1–50. https://doi.org/10.4018/JGIM.386381
• Zhang, X. (2025). Fairness and effectiveness in AI-driven educational assessments: Challenges and mitigation strategies. Journal of Innovation and Development, 11(1), 7–10.
