Exploring the Role of Culture and Gender in the Use of Rational Appeals: A Genre Study of Saudi and Australian Students’ Emails
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59992/IJESA.2025.v4n11p3الكلمات المفتاحية:
Rational Appeals، Cultural & Gender Differences، Email Communications، Persuasion، Pragmatics & Politeness، Pedagogical Implicationالملخص
Genre studies have been primarily concerned with identifying professional writing within various contexts, including legal discourse, business settings, and particularly relevant to this study, academic research writing. Research findings thus far have indicated that native Anglo-Saxon English speakers tend to employ more rational appeals than non-native speakers. However, the full range of underlying strategies and factors have not yet been thoroughly explored due to a lack of comparable tasks. This study explores the approaches taken by potential PhD Saudi students (100 participants) and Australian students (20 participants) when emailing their prospective PhD supervisors, specifically with regards to their use of rational appeals in discussing their future PhD research. The results of this study reveal significant differences in gender and culture. In terms of cultural differences, the two groups differed in their use of four particular moves, namely how they discussed their PhD plans, interests, justification and experience. The writing styles that differentiated both groups in their use of rational appeals, as well as broader pedagogical implications, are also discussed.
المراجع
• Abbad, A., Mansur, N., & Ypsilandis, G. (2019). Persuasive strategies in Saudi academic female application letter writing. Rhetoric and Communications Journal, 40(40), 12. Retrieved from http://rhetoric.bg/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/Abbad-Masur-Ypsilandis-issue-40- July-2019- final.pdf.
• Al-Ali, M. N. (2006). Genre-pragmatic strategies in English letter-of-application writing of Jordanian Arabic–English bilinguals. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 9(1), 119-139. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050608668633.
• Al-Momani, K. R. (2014). Strategies of persuasion in letters of complaint in academic context: the case of Jordanian university students’ complaints. Discourse Studies, 16(6), 705-728. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445614546257.
• Bhatia, V. K. (2014). Analysing genre: language use in professional settings. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315844992.
• Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage.
• Connor, U., & Connor, U. M. (1996). Contrastive rhetoric: cross-cultural aspects of second language writing.
• Connor, U., & Gladkov, K. (2004). Rhetorical appeals in fundraising direct mail letters. In U. Connor, & T.A. Upton (Eds.), Discourse in the professions: Perspectives from corpus linguistics, (pp. 257- 286). https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.16.11con.
• Connor, U., & Upton, T. A. (2004). Discourse in the professions: Perspectives from corpus linguistics. https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.16.
• Connor, U., Davis, K. W., & De Rycker, T. (1995). Correctness and clarity in applying for overseas jobs: a cross-cultural analysis of US and Flemish applications. Text & Talk, 15(4), 457-476. https://doi.org/10.1515/text.1.1995.15.4.457.
• Farnia, M., Ypsilandis, G., & Ghasempour, B. (2019). Intracultural Iranian persuasion. Journal of Intercultural Communication, 51.
• Flowerdew, J., & Dudley‐Evans, T. (2002). Genre analysis of editorial letters to international journal contributors. Applied linguistics, 23(4), 463-489. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/23.4.463.
• Graham, S. L. J. J. O. P. (2007). Disagreeing to agree: Conflict. (im) politeness and identity in a computer- mediated community, 39(4), 742-759. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2006.11.017.
• Hall-Mills, S., & Apel, K. (2013). Narrative and expository writing of adolescents with language-learning disabilities: A pilot study. Communication Disorders Quarterly, 34(3), 135-143. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525740112465001.
• Hyland, K. (2018). Metadiscourse: exploring interaction in writing. London: Bloomsbury.
• Ismail, S. (2010). Arabic and English persuasive writing of Arabs from a contrastive rhetoric perspective. [PhD thesis]. Penn State University.
• James, C., Scholfield, P., & Ypsiladis, G. (1992). Communication failures in persuasive writing: towards a typology, 3, 174-193.
• Locher, M. A. (2008). Relational work, politeness and identity construction. In Handbook of interpersonal communication (Antos, & E. Ventola ed., pp. 509-540). Berlin:de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110211399.4.509.
• Locher, M. A. (2010a). Introduction: Politeness and impoliteness in computer-mediated communication. Journal of Politeness Research, 6(1), 1-5.
• Suchan, J. (2014). Toward an understanding of Arabic persuasion: a Western perspective. International Journal of Business Communication, 51(3), 279-303. https://doi.org/10.1177/2329488414525401.
• Swales, J. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Tannen, D. (1999). The display of (gendered) identities in talk at work. Reinventing identities: the gendered self in discourse, 221-240.
• Tannen, D. (2009). Framing and face: the relevance of the presentation of self to linguistic discourse analysis. Social Psychology Quarterly, 72(4), 300-305. https://doi.org/10.1177/019027250907200404
• Wang, H. (2005). A pragmatic genre analysis of job application letters. Sino-US English Teaching, 2(12), 76-81.
• Zhu, Y. (2013). A cross-cultural analysis of English and Chinese business faxes: a genre perspective. Ibérica, 26, 35-54.
