العوامل المؤثرة في استخدام المرأة اليمنية لتكنولوجيا الأموال عبر الهاتف المحمول

أولاً: المراجع العربية

‌أ. الكتب:

1) الأشعري، أحمد بن داود المزجاجي (1428هـ)، الوجيز في طرق البحث العلمي، ط1. جدة: خوارزم العلمية للنشر والتوزيع.

2) البداينه، ذياب (1419هـ) المرشد إلى كتابة الرسائل الجامعية، الرياض: أكاديمية نايف العربية للعلوم الأمنية.

3) الصيرفي، محمد. (2001). البحث العلمي: الدليل التطبيقي للباحثين. عمان. دار وائل.

4) شراز، محمد صالح، (2009)، التحليل الإحصائي للبيانات باستخدام برنامج المجموعة الإحصائية للعلوم الاجتماعية SPSS الطبعة الأولى جامعة أم القرى الرياض السعودية.

5) فهمي، محمد شامل بهاء الدين (2005)، الإحصاء بلا معاناة: المفاهيم والتطبيقات باستخدام برنامج SPSS، الجزء الأول، الرياض: إدارة الطباعة والنشر بمعهد الإدارة العامة.

‌ب. المجلات والدوريات:

1) حُــــميد، سمــاح علي عبد العزيز (2022). العوامل المؤثرة في تبني عملاء بنك التسليف التعاوني الزراعي للخدمات المصرفية عبر الهاتف النقال. مجلة الأندلس للعلوم الإنسانية والاجتماعية, 9(60).‎

2) البنك المركزي اليمني، التقرير السنوي 2022م.

‌ج. الرسائل والأطروحات الجامعية:

1) حُــــميد، سمــاح علي عبد العزيز (2017). العوامل المؤثرة في تبني عملاء بنك التسليف التعاوني الزراعي للخدمات المصرفية عبر الهاتف النقال رسالة ماجستير في إدارة الأعمال، الأكاديمية اليمنية للدراسات العليا، اليمن.

‌د. الشبكة العنكبوتية:

• https://centralbank.gov.ye

• https://arabstates.unwomen.org/en/countries/yemen

• https://www.undp.org/yemen

• https://www.cgap.org/topics/women-financial-inclusion

• https://sanaacenter.org/

ثانياً: المراجع الأجنبية

• Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process, 50, 179–211.

• Alexandre, B., Reynaud, E., Osiurak, F., & Navarro, J. (2018). Acceptance and acceptability criteria: A literature review. Cognition, Technology & Work, 20, 167–177.

• Alliance for Financial Inclusion, 2012, “Guideline Note Mobile Financial Services: Basic Terminology”.

• Bandura, A. (1997). Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York: Freeman.

• Bandura, A. Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol. Rev. 1977, 84, 191–215. [CrossRef] [PubMed].

• Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13, 319–339.

• Directive 2000/46/EC of the European Parliament and the Council on the taking up and prudential supervision of the business of electronic money institutions.

• Directive 2009/110/EC on the taking-up, pursuit and prudential regulation of the business of electronic money institutions amending Directives2005/6-/EC and 2006/48/EC and repealing Directive 2000/46/EC.

• Distler, V., Lallemand, C., & Bellet, T. (2018). Acceptability and acceptance of autonomous mobility on demand: The impact of an immersive experience. Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 612, 1–10.

• Donovan, K. (2012). Mobile money for financial inclusion.

• Elnaiem, Thuraya,2019 The Role of Trust and Gender in Mobile Money Adoption in Lusaka, Zambia: An Analysis Using the Technology Acceptance Model. Master thesis The University of Guelph Ontario, Canada.

• FinMark Trust (2016) SADC mobile money guidelines (Unpublished).

• FinMark Trust. GSMA (2015) State of the industry report: Mobile Money. GSMA, United Kingdom.

• Fishbein, M., and Ajzen, I. (1975). "Belief, Attitude, Intentions and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research.

• Fredrick, A.J., and Dosset, D.L. (1983). Attitude-behavior relation. A comparison of the fishben azjen and the bentler speckart models. Journal of personality and social psychology,45, pp 501-512.

• GSMA (2010). Mobile Money Definition. Retrieved from: https://www.gsma.com/mobilefordevelopment/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/mobilemoney definitionsnomarks56.pdf.

• GSMA 2023 State of the Industry Report on Mobile Money 2022.

• Hair, J.F., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J. & Anderson, R.E. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis (7th Ed.) Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

• Hale, J. L., Householder, B. J., & Greene, K. L. (2002). The theory of reasoned action. The persuasion handbook: Developments in theory and practice, 14(2002), 259-286.

• IFC Mobile Money Study 2011.

• Ismail, L., Moya, M. B., Bwiino, K., & Ismael, K. (2017). Examining determinants of behavioural intention in adoption of mobile money transfer services in Uganda. ICTACT Journal on Management Studies, 3(1), 433-439.

• Jenkins, B. (2008). Developing mobile money ecosystems. USA: IFC, World Bank and Harvard Kennedy School of Government.

• Jonathan Greenacre and Ross P Buckley, “Using Trusts to Protect Mobile Money Customers”, (2014) Singapore Journal of Legal Studies, 59-78.

• Mas, I., & Radcliffe, D. (2010). Mobile payments go viral: M-PESA in Kenya. Washington, DC: World Bank.

• Moore, D.S., McCabe, G.P., & Craig, B.A. (2014). Introduction to the practice of statistics. New York, NY: W.H. Freeman and Company.

• Mutahar, A. M., Daud, N. M., Ramayah, T., Isaac, O., & Aldholay, A. H. (2018). The effect of awareness and perceived risk on the technology acceptance model (TAM): mobile banking in Yemen. International Journal of Services and Standards, 12(2), 180-204.

• NASA (2012). Technology Readiness Level. Retrieved from https://www.nasa.gov/directorates/heo/scan/engineering/technology/txt_accordion1.html. Accessed 4 Feb 2024.

• Ndiwalana, A., Morawczynski, O., & Popov, O. (2010). Mobile Money Use in Uganda: A Preliminary Study. Kampala: Makerere University.

• Nguyen, T. (2022). Does Financial Knowledge Matter in Using Fintech Services? Evidence from an Emerging Economy. Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14095083.

• Njele, C. C., & Phiri, J. (2023). Factors Affecting Usage of Mobile Money Services and Their Impact on Financial Inclusion: Case of Lusaka Province. International Journal of Business and Management, 16(7), 104-104.

• Paddy Mugambe,2017 UTAUT Model in Explaining the Adoption of Mobile Money Usage by MSMEs' Customers in Uganda, Advances in Economics and Business 5(3): 129-136, 2017 http://www.hrpub.org DOI: 10.13189/aeb.2017.050302Uganda Management Institute, Uganda.

• Perlman L J Legal and regulatory aspects of mobile financial services (Unpublished PhD thesis University of Pretoria 2012).

• Riley, Pamela, Sarah Romorini, Emma Golub, and Maggie Stokes. 2020Digital Financial Services in the MENA Region. Rockville, MD: Sustaining Health Outcomes through the Private Sector Plus Project, Abt Associates Inc.

• Rogers, E. M. (1962), Diffusion of innovations. New York: The Free Press.

• Rogers, E. M. (2003), Diffusion of Innovations. New York: The Free Press.

• Saxena, Amitabh 2011, Electronic Payment Systems 201.

• Schuitema, G., Steg, L., & Forward, S. (2010). Explaining differences in acceptability before and acceptance after the implementation of a congestion charge in Stockholm. Transportation Research Part a: Policy and Practice, 44(2), 99–109.

• Senyo, P. K., & Osabutey, E. L. (2020). Unearthing antecedents to financial inclusion through FinTech innovations. Technovation, 98, 102155.

• UN Women. (2020). Gender equality and women's empowerment in public administration: Yemen country profile. New York: UN Women.

• Valentine Nii Lante Cato,2022 Acceptance of Mobile Money Technology by Retailers in Accra, Ghana, A dissertation submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Commerce in Information Systems and Technology College of Law and Management Studies, School of Management, Information Technology and Governance.

• Venkatesh, V., & Bala, H. (2008). Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decision sciences, 39(2), 273-315.

• Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS quarterly, 157-178.

• Viswanath Venkatesh, Michael G. Morris, Gordon B. Davis and Fred D. Davis, “User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward A Unified View”, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 27, No. 3, pp. 425-478, 2003.

• Adel, Zouaghi & Hasan, Aznan & Othman, Anwar. (2023). Prospects for using digital financial services in banks to enhance financial inclusion in Algeria. ISRA International Arabic Journal of Islamic Journal.

• Blunt, M., Chong, A. Y. L., Tsigna, Zayyad, Tsigna & Venkatesh, V. (2022). Meta-Analysis of the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT): Challenging its Validity and Charting a Research Agenda in the Red Ocean. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 23(1), 13–95.

• Davis, F. (1985), A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems - theory and results, PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

• Davis, F. (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly.

• Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13, 319–339.

• Fujihara, R. K., Montezano, L., & Alfinito, S. (2022). Theories, models, and frameworks for the use and acceptance of information and communication technologies. Revista Gestão & Tecnologia, 22(3), 145-173.

• Hale, J. L., Householder, B. J., & Greene, K. L. (2002). The theory of reasoned action. The persuasion handbook: Developments in theory and practice, 14(2002), 259-286.

• Mutahar, A. M., Daud, N. M., Ramayah, T., Isaac, O., & Aldholay, A. H. (2018). The effect of awareness and perceived risk on the technology acceptance model (TAM): mobile banking in Yemen. International Journal of Services and Standards, 12(2), 180-204.

• Venkatesh, V. and Davis, F. D. (2000), “A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies”, Management Science.

• Venkatesh, V., & Bala, H. (2008). Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decision sciences, 39(2), 273-315.

• Venkatesh, V., Morris, M., Davis, G., & Davis, F. (2003). User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View. MIS Quarterly.

• Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 157-178.