Body Engineering Rehabilitation and Related Manual Therapy Approaches in Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation: A Scoping Review of Terminology, Therapeutic Approaches, Mechanisms, and Clinical Evidence
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59992/IJSR.2026.v5n10p9الكلمات المفتاحية:
Body Engineering Rehabilitation، Manual Therapy، Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation، Physical Therapy، Myofascial Therapy، Neural Mobilization، Muscle Energy Technique، Neuromuscular Rehabilitation، Rehabilitation، Scoping Reviewالملخص
Background: Body Engineering Rehabilitation is a practitioner -developed rehabilitation approach that has been described in conceptual and clinical publications associated with manual and hands-on rehabilitation. Although publications describing the approach have emerged, its terminology, conceptual foundations, therapeutic components, proposed mechanisms, clinical applications, and empirical evidence have not been comprehensively mapped. Because the broader manual therapy literature is heterogeneous and includes multiple overlapping intervention labels, distinguishing direct evidence for Body Engineering from related evidence is important for maintaining scientific neutrality.
Objective: To map and synthesize the available literature concerning the terminology, theoretical foundations, therapeutic approaches, proposed mechanisms, clinical applications, and evidence relevant to Body Engineering Rehabilitation and related manual and movement-based approaches in musculoskeletal rehabilitation.
Methods: A scoping review design was adopted in accordance with the JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis and reported using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). Search reporting was informed by PRISMA-S. The Population–Concept–Context framework was used to define eligibility. Literature directly describing Body Engineering Rehabilitation was mapped separately from related evidence concerning manual therapy, joint mobilization or manipulation, myofascial and fascial interventions, muscle energy techniques, neural mobilization, neuromuscular approaches, and combined manual therapy and exercise. Evidence was categorized according to its directness, design, intervention architecture, and methodological limitations. Because database export files and complete search histories were not available for all information sources, exact database retrieval counts were not fabricated and remain subject to verification.
Results: The direct Body Engineering evidence base was limited and heterogeneous. The mapped direct literature comprised a foundational conceptual book, two case-based clinical publications, and a recent literature review addressing the integration of Body Engineering principles into postoperative anterior cruciate ligament rehabilitation. No randomized controlled or comparative clinical study specifically evaluating a standardized Body Engineering intervention was identified in the direct evidence set. The available case-based reports involved multimodal rehabilitation programs, limiting attribution of observed improvements specifically to Body Engineering. The broader literature demonstrated substantial heterogeneity in manual therapy terminology, intervention description, treatment dosage, and reporting. Evidence concerning muscle energy techniques, myofascial /fascial interventions, neural mobilization, neuromuscular approaches, and combined manual therapy and exercise showed variable findings and methodological limitations. Mechanistic literature suggested possible neurophysiological, proprioceptive, sensorimotor, autonomic, and biomechanical responses to related manual interventions, but causal links between these mechanisms and clinically meaningful outcomes remain incompletely established.
Conclusions: Body Engineering Rehabilitation has been explicitly described and clinically applied, but its current direct evidence base remains limited and is dominated by conceptual and case-based publications. The available evidence does not permit definitive conclusions regarding independent clinical effectiveness, comparative effectiveness, superiority, or a mechanism specific to Body Engineering. Future research should prioritize operational definition, treatment standardization, reproducibility, independent replication, feasibility studies, comparative trials, and appropriately designed mechanistic investigations.
المراجع
• Ahmed, U. A., Nadasan, T., Van Oosterwijck, J., & Maharaj, S. S. (2021). The effect of muscle energy technique in the management of chronic mechanical low back pain: A scoping review. Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation, 34(2), 179–193.
• Al-Baqaei, M. K. (2019). المدخل إلى هندسة الجسد التأهيلية لعلوم العلاج باليد [Introduction to rehabilitation body engineering for hand therapy]. Dar Al-Khalij.
• Alboqaei, M. K. (2024). Treatment of spastic quadriplegia resulting from hypoxia in newborn through body engineering technique-hand therapy: Case report described by parents: Qualitative study. International Journal for Scientific Research, 3(9), 254–261. https://doi.org/10.59992/IJSR.2024.v3n9p12.
• Alboqaei, M. K. (2025). Treatment of quadriplegia resulting from an accident through body engineering, hand therapy technique. Educational and International Multidisciplinary Journal.
• Alboqaei, M. K. (2026). Integrating Body Engineering principles in postoperative ACL rehabilitation for functional recovery: A literature review. International Journal for Scientific Research, 5(3), 93–101. https://doi.org/10.59992/IJSR.2026.v5n3p4.
• Aromataris, E., Lockwood, C., Porritt, K., Pilla, B., & Jordan, Z. (Eds.). (2024). JBI manual for evidence synthesis. JBI. https://doi.org/10.46658/JBIMES-24-01.
• Cuñado González, Á., Belda Berenguer, S., Luque Mañas, J. M., & Martin-Pintado-Zugasti, A. (2021). Validation of a sham novel neural mobilization technique in patients with non-specific low back pain: A randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Musculoskeletal Science and Practice, 53, 102378.
• Hadjisavvas, S., Themistocleous, I.-C., Efstathiou, M. A., Papamichael, E., Michailidou, C., & Stefanakis, M. (2026). The effect of joint mobilization and manipulation on proprioception: Systematic review with limited meta-analysis. Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology, 11(1), 59.
• Isaji, Y., Sasaki, D., Kon, Y., Kurasawa, Y., & Kitagawa, T. (2024). Fascial manipulation for musculoskeletal disorders: A scoping review. Journal of Bodywork & Movement Therapies, 40, 23–29.
• Jahromi, M. M., Basset, D., Borrell, J. A., & Sharma, N. K. (2026). Neurophysiological response of spinal mobilization and manipulation in individuals with and without musculoskeletal spine disorders: A scoping review. European Journal of Neuroscience, 64(2), e70632.
• Keter, D. L., Bialosky, J. E., Brochetti, K., Courtney, C. A., Funabashi, M., Karas, S., Learman, K., & Cook, C. E. (2025). The mechanisms of manual therapy: A living review of systematic, narrative, and scoping reviews. PLOS ONE, 20(3), e0319586.
• Narenthiran, P., Granville Smith, I., & Williams, F. M. K. (2025). Does the addition of manual therapy to exercise therapy improve pain and disability outcomes in chronic low back pain: A systematic review. Journal of Bodywork & Movement Therapies, 42, 146–152.
• Peters, M. D. J., Godfrey, C., McInerney, P., Munn, Z., Tricco, A. C., & Khalil, H. (2024). Scoping reviews. In E. Aromataris, C. Lockwood, K. Porritt, B. Pilla, & Z. Jordan (Eds.), JBI manual for evidence synthesis. JBI. https://doi.org/10.46658/JBIMES-24-09.
• Rethlefsen, M. L., Kirtley, S., Waffenschmidt, S., Ayala, A. P., Moher, D., Page, M. J., Koffel, J. B., & PRISMA-S Group. (2021). PRISMA-S: An extension to the PRISMA statement for reporting literature searches in systematic reviews. Systematic Reviews, 10, 39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-020-01542-z.
• Ruzich, J. J., Klopper, M., Dohrmann, C. M., Rhon, D. I., & Young, J. L. (2024). How reproducible are manual therapy interventions in trials for low back pain? A scoping review. Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy, 54(4), 248–257.
• Santos, S. G., et al. (2022). Effectiveness of muscle energy technique in patients with nonspecific low back pain: A systematic review with meta-analysis.
• Tricco, A. C., Lillie, E., Zarin, W., O'Brien, K. K., Colquhoun, H., Levac, D., Moher, D., Peters, M. D. J., Horsley, T., Weeks, L., Hempel, S., Akl, E. A., Chang, C., McGowan, J., Stewart, L., Hartling, L., Aldcroft, A., Wilson, M. G., Garritty, C., ... Straus, S. E. (2018). PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and explanation. Annals of Internal Medicine, 169(7), 467–473. https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-0850.
• Wenger, L. E., Barrett, D. R., Rhon, D. I., & Young, J. L. (2024). Evaluating and characterizing the scope of care for interventions labeled as manual therapy in low back pain trials: A scoping review. Physical Therapy, 104(4), pzad178.
