A National Survey into referral and training in the management of oesophageal perforation in the United Kingdom
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59992/IJSR.2025.v4n7p7Keywords:
Oesophageal Perforation, Referral, Training, United KingdomAbstract
Background: Over the last 30 years, oesophageal surgery amongst thoracic surgeons has reduced by 80%, and forms less than 1% of current thoracic practice. Oesophageal perforation has a high morbidity, and mortality rates can be as high as 30% if not treated. There are currently no guidelines regarding referral for the management of oesophageal perforation in the UK.
Methods: We designed an online survey to ascertain the current expert opinion on the management of oesophageal perforation, which was validated and approved by the society of cardiothoracic surgery of Great Britan and Ireland- SCTS. This was sent to all consultant thoracic (N=77) and cardiothoracic (N=85) surgeons identified in the SCTS registry. In total, 49 responses were received from a variety of UK regions.
Results: Many responses indicated that emergency cover for oesophageal perforation came exclusively from the upper gastrointestinal (GI) surgeons (50%) compared to thoracic surgeons (18%). Only 37% agreed they would manage the patients themselves and a similar number were comfortable to operate alone. 46% of believed the service should be taken over exclusively by the UGI surgeons.
With regards to surgical experience: 55% agreed they could comfortably deal with complex cases, which correlated with having >16 years experience. Only 25% of consultants with 1-5 years experience felt confident to manage the condition alone.
With regards to previous training, 100% of consultants who trained >16 years ago believed they had sufficient exposure to oesophageal surgery as a trainee, compared to 50-70% for those trained <16 years ago. Only 2% believed current trainees receive sufficient exposure to oesophageal perforation nationwide, and 28% believed oesophageal surgery should be taken off the training curriculum.
Conclusion: The present study finds much heterogeneity in the way oesophageal perforation is managed nationally. The willingness of thoracic surgeons to manage the oesophagus correlates with prior exposure. We believe this has important implications for current training and a national consensus for future direction is required.
References
1. Vidarsdottir H, Blondal S, Alfredsson H, Geirsson A, Gudbjartsson T. Oesophageal perforations in Iceland: A whole population study on incidence, aetiology and surgical outcome. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010;58(8):476–80.
2. Biancari F, D’Andrea V, Paone R, Di Marco C, Savino G, Koivukangas V, et al. Current treatment and outcome of esophageal perforations in adults: Systematic review and meta-analysis of 75 studies. World J Surg. 2013;37(5):1051–9.
3. Markar SR, Mackenzie H, Wiggins T, Askari A, Faiz O, Zaninotto G, et al. Management and outcomes of oesophageal perforation: A national study of 2564 patients in England. Gut. 2015;Conference(August):A38.
4. Younes Z, Johnson DA. The spectrum of spontaneous and iatrogenic esophageal injury: perforations, Mallory-Weiss tears, and hematomas. J Clin Gastroenterol. 1999;29(4):306–17.
5. Baikoussis NG, Beis JP, Siminelakis SN. Surgical repair of esophageal rupture: How to do it. Chirurgia (Bucur). 2009;22(5):247–8.
6. Fatimi SH, Sheikh S, Ali AA. Primary repair of an esophageal rupture using pleural flap. J Coll Physicians Surg Pakistan. 2006;16(4):309–10.
7. D’Journo XB, Doddoli C, Avaro JP, Lienne P, Giovannini MA, Giudicelli R, et al. Long-Term Observation and Functional State of the Esophagus After Primary Repair of Spontaneous Esophageal Rupture. Ann Thorac Surg. 2006;81(5):1858–62.
8. Rosiere A, Mulier S, Khoury A, Michel LA. Management of oesophageal perforation after delayed diagnosis: The merit of tissue flap reinforcement. Acta Chir Belg. 2003;103(5):497–501.
9. Freeman RK, Van Woerkom JM, Vyverberg A, Ascioti AJ. Esophageal Stent Placement for the Treatment of Spontaneous Esophageal Perforations. Ann Thorac Surg. 2009;88(1):194–8.
10. Freeman RK, Herrera A, Ascioti AJ, Dake M, Mahidhara RS. A propensity-matched comparison of cost and outcomes after esophageal stent placement or primary surgical repair for iatrogenic esophageal perforation. Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2015. p. 1550–5.
11. Vogel SB, Rout WR, Martin TD, Abbitt PL. Esophageal perforation in adults: aggressive, conservative treatment lowers morbidity and mortality. Ann Surg. 2005;241(6):1016-21-3.
12. Nirula R. Esophageal Perforation. Surgical Clinics of North America. 2014. p. 35–41.
13. Muir AD, White J, McGuigan JA, McManus KG, Graham AN. Treatment and outcomes of oesophageal perforation in a tertiary referral centre. European Journal of Cardio-thoracic Surgery. 2003. p. 799–804.
14. Brunelli A, Falcoz PE, D’amico T, Hansen H, Lim E, Massard G, et al. European guidelines on structure and qualification of general thoracic surgery. Eur J Cardio-thoracic Surg. 2014;45(5):779–86.
15. Furugaki K, Yoshida J, Hokazono K, Emoto T, Nakashima J, Ohyama M, et al. Esophageal ruptures: Triage using the systemic inflammatory response syndrome score. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011;59(3):220–4.
16. Keeling WB, Miller DL, Lam GT, Kilgo P, Miller JI, Mansour KA, et al. Low mortality after treatment for esophageal perforation: A single-center experience. Ann Thorac Surg. 2010;90(5):1669–73.
17. Chu D, Vaporciyan AA, Iannettoni MD, Ikonomidis JS, Odell DD, Shemin RJ, et al. Are There Gaps in Current Thoracic Surgery Residency Training Programs? Ann Thorac Surg. 2016;101(6):2350–5.
18. Tchantchaleishvili V, Lapar DJ, Stephens EH, Berfield KS, Odell DD, Denino WF. Current integrated cardiothoracic surgery residents: A thoracic surgery residents association survey. Ann Thorac Surg. 2015;99(3):1040–7.
