Nurse-led Interventions to Enhance Adherence to Chronic Medications
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59992/IJSR.2023.v2n11p13Keywords:
Nurse-Led Interventions, Medication Adherence, Chronic Diseases, Clinical Trials, Personalized CareAbstract
Introduction: Chronic diseases require long-term medication adherence to achieve optimal health outcomes, yet non-adherence remains a significant challenge. Nurse-led interventions have been proposed as a strategy to enhance adherence. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of nurse-led interventions in improving medication adherence among patients with chronic conditions.
Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted across several databases, including PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, and PsycINFO, for studies published up to 2022. Only interventional studies and clinical trials led by nurses focusing on chronic medication adherence were included. The selection process involved screening for relevance, assessing methodological quality, and extracting data on adherence rates, intervention types, and patient outcomes.
Results: Eight studies met the inclusion criteria, revealing a variety of nurse-led interventions, such as personalized counseling, telehealth follow-ups, educational workshops, and digital reminders. Sample sizes ranged from 30 to over 500 participants. The interventions demonstrated a significant improvement in medication adherence, with increases ranging from 15% to 25%. Specific interventions, like personalized care plans and technology-enhanced strategies, showed particular promise.
Comparative analysis with other non-nurse-led interventions in the literature suggested that nurse-led approaches are at least as effective, with some evidence indicating superior outcomes in certain contexts.
Conclusions: Nurse-led interventions are effective in enhancing medication adherence among patients with chronic diseases. The review highlights the importance of personalized and technology-enhanced approaches within these interventions. Despite limitations such as study heterogeneity and potential publication bias, the findings support the integration of nurse-led strategies into clinical practice to improve chronic disease management. Future research should focus on identifying the most effective components of these interventions across diverse patient populations.
References
1. Williams B, Mancia G, Spiering W, Agabiti Rosei E, Azizi M, Burnier M, et al. ESC/ESH Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension. Eur Heart J 2018;39: 3021–3104.
2. World Health Organization. Hypertension. Geneve: WHO News Room, Fact Sheet; 2021.
3. Mills KT, Stefanescu A, He J. The global epidemiology of hypertension. Nat Rev Nephrol 2020;16:223–237.
4. Benziger CP, Roth GA, Moran AE. The Global Burden of Disease Study and the Preventable Burden of NCD. Glob Heart 2016;11:393–397.
5. WHO. Mortality and burden of disease attributable to selected major risks. Geneve: World Health Organization; 2009; 1–70.
6. Aune D, Giovannucci E, Boffetta P, Fadnes LT, Keum N, Norat T, et al. Fruit and vegetable intake and the risk of cardiovascular disease, total cancer and allcause mortality-a systematic review and doseresponse meta-analysis of prospective studies. Int J Epidemiol 2017;46:1029–1056.
7. Lee IM, Shiroma EJ, Lobelo F, Puska P, Blair SN, Katzmarzyk PT, et al. Effect of physical inactivity on major non-communicable diseases worldwide: an analysis of burden of disease and life expectancy. Lancet 2012;380:219–229.
8. Alzhanova A, Schultz T, Hendriks J, Schadewaldt V. Effectiveness of nurse-led clinics for patients with coronary heart disease. PROSPERO.
https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/displayrecord.php?RecordID=205270 (4 October 2020).
9. Aaby A, Friis K, Christensen B, Rowlands G, Maindal HT. Health literacy is associated with health behaviour and self-reported health: a large population-based study in individuals with cardiovascular disease. Eur J Prev Cardiol 2017;24:1880–1888.
10. Butler M, Schultz T, Drennan J. Substitution of nurses for physicians in the hospital setting for patient, process of care, and economic outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2020;5:CD013616.
11. Carrington MJ, Zimmet P. Nurse health and lifestyle modification versus standard care in 40 to 70 year old regional adults: study protocol of the Management to Optimize Diabetes and metabolic syndrome Risk reduction via Nurse-led intervention (MODERN) randomized controlled trial. BMC Health Serv Res 2017;17:813.
12. Karataş T, Polat Ü. Effect of nurse-led program on the exercise behavior of coronary artery patients: Pender’s health promotion model. Patient Educ Couns 2021;104: 1183–1192.
13. Westland H, Schuurmans MJ, Bos-Touwen ID, de Bruin-van Leersum MA, Monninkhof EM, Schröder CD, et al. Effectiveness of the nurseled activate intervention in patients at risk of cardiovascular disease in primary care: a cluster-randomised controlled trial. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs 2020;19:721–731.
14. Kerry SM, Markus HS, Khong TK, Cloud GC, Tulloch J, Coster D, et al. Home blood pressure monitoring with nurse-led telephone support among patients with hypertension and a history of stroke: a community-based randomized controlled trial. CMAJ 2013;185:23–31.
15. Stephen C, Halcomb E, Fernandez R, McInnes S, Batterham M, Zwar N. Nurse-led interventions to manage hypertension in general practice: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Adv Nurs 2022;78:1281–1293.
16. Clark CE, Smith LF, Taylor RS, Campbell JL. Nurse led interventions to improve control of blood pressure in people with hypertension: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 2010;341:c3995.
17. Bulto L, Roseleur J, Noonan S, Nesbitt K, Gebremichael L, Pinero de Plaza MA, et al. Effectiveness of nurse-led interventions versus usual care to optimise blood pressure management and lifestyle behaviour modification in patients with hypertension: a systematic review protocol. Prospero Int Prospective Regist Syst Rev 2022;1–13.
18. Tufanaru C, Munn Z, Aromataris E, Campbell J, Hopp L. Chapter 3: systematic reviews of effectiveness. In: Aromataris E and Munn Z (eds.), JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis. JBI; 2020. https://synthesismanual.jbi.global.
19. Gabb GM, Mangoni AA, Anderson CS, Cowley D, Dowden JS, Golledge J, et al. Guideline for the diagnosis and management of hypertension in adults—2016. Med J Aust 2016;205:85–89.
20. Munn Z, Aromataris E, Tufanaru C, Stern C, Porritt K, Farrow J, et al. The development of software to support multiple systematic review types: the Joanna Briggs Institute System for the Unified Management, Assessment and Review of Information (JBI SUMARI). Int J Evid Based Healthc 2019;17:36– 43.
21. Schünemann H, Brożek J, Guyatt G, Oxman A GRADE Handbook for grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations; 2013.
22. Schroeder K, Fahey T, Hollinghurst S, Peters TJ. Nurse-led adherence support in hypertension: a randomized controlled trial. Fam Pract 2005;22:144– 151.
23. Dean SC, Kerry SM, Khong TK, Kerry SR, Oakeshott P. Evaluation of a specialist nurse-led hypertension clinic with consultant backup in two inner city general practices: randomized controlled trial. Fam Pract 2014;31:172–179.
24. Bosworth HB, Olsen MK, Grubber JM, Neary AM, Orr MM, Powers BJ, et al. Two self-management interventions to improve hypertension control: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med 2009;151:687.
25. Yip BH, Lee EK, Sit RW, Wong C, Li X, Wong EL, et al. Nurse-led repeat prescription for patients with controlled hypertension: a randomised controlled trial. Hong Kong Med J 2018;24:4–7
