Prehospital Emergency Interventions for Idiopathic Spinal Cord Injury Prevention
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59992/IJSR.2023.v2n11p16Keywords:
Intervention, Spinal Cord Injury, Prehospital Management, Prevention, OutcomesAbstract
Introduction: Despite the critical role of prehospital management, variations persist in global practices. Recent literature indicates that about 35% of emergency medical services (EMS) providers adhere to established guidelines for spinal immobilization in certain regions. This systematic review aimed to contribute to the ongoing dialogue surrounding the prehospital management of SCIs, ultimately improving outcomes for individuals affected by these traumatic injuries.
Methods: A comprehensive literature review was conducted through a systematic search of electronic databases, employing refined search terms and Boolean operators to focus on prehospital management of spinal cord injuries from the inception of each database to July 2023. Inclusion criteria involved original research articles, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses, with a screening process led by two independent reviewers and subsequent data extraction to inform evidence synthesis, accounting for study limitations and bias assessments.
Results: This systematic review summarizes findings from eight clinical interventional studies on preventing idiopathic spinal cord injury (SCI) during prehospital emergency aid for traumatized patients. The studies encompassed diverse populations and interventions, revealing variable effectiveness in reducing idiopathic SCI incidence. Notably, specialized protocols for pediatric spinal immobilization and modifications for geriatric patients demonstrated promising effectiveness, emphasizing the importance of age-specific considerations in prehospital care for SCI prevention.
Conclusions: The systematic review findings underscore the nuanced nature of prehospital interventions for idiopathic spinal cord injury prevention, emphasizing the importance of age-specific considerations and cautioning against a one-size-fits-all approach, while also highlighting the need for ongoing research to refine protocols and improve patient outcomes given the lack of definitive evidence in favor of early versus delayed immobilization.
References
1. Rupp, R., Spinal Cord Injury, in Neuroprosthetics and Brain-Computer Interfaces in Spinal Cord Injury: A Guide for Clinicians and End Users. 2021, Springer. p. 3-35.
2. Middleton, J.M., et al., Right care, right time, right place: improving outcomes for people with spinal cord injury through early access to intervention and improved access to specialised care: study protocol. BMC Health Services Research, 2014. 14(1): p. 1-8.
3. Yue, J.K., et al., Update on critical care for acute spinal cord injury in the setting of polytrauma. Neurosurgical focus, 2017. 43(5): p. E19.
4. Singh, A., et al., Global prevalence and incidence of traumatic spinal cord injury. Clinical epidemiology, 2014: p. 309-331.
5. Ahuja, C.S., et al., Traumatic spinal cord injury. Nature reviews Disease primers, 2017. 3(1): p. 1-21.
6. Organization, W.H. and I.S.C. Society, International perspectives on spinal cord injury. 2013: World Health Organization.
7. McDonald, N., D. Kriellaars, and R.T. Pryce, Paramedic attitudes towards prehospital spinal care: a cross-sectional survey. BMC Emergency Medicine, 2022. 22(1): p. 162.
8. Wang, T.Y., et al., Management of acute traumatic spinal cord injury: a review of the literature. Frontiers in surgery, 2021. 8: p. 698736.
9. Nolte, P.C., et al., Analysis of cervical spine immobilization during patient transport in emergency medical services. European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery, 2021. 47: p. 719-726.
10. Alharbi, A., et al., The Effect of Lower Limb Combined Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation on Skeletal Muscle Signaling for Glucose Utilization, Myofiber Distribution, and Metabolic Function after Spinal Cord Injury. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2023. 20(20).
11. Blanchard, J., et al., Pressure Injury Data Reconciliation in a Randomized Controlled Trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 2023. 104(11): p. 1833-1839.
12. Crack, L.E., et al., Zoledronic acid after spinal cord injury mitigates losses in proximal femoral strength independent of ambulation ability. Osteoporos Int, 2023. 34(9): p. 1637-1645.
13. Dionne, A., et al., Is it safe to initiate activity-based therapy within days following traumatic spinal cord injury? Preliminary results from the PROMPTSCI trial. J Spinal Cord Med, 2023. 46(6): p. 980-985.
14. Ely, M.R., et al., Exercise Training Does Not Attenuate Cardiac Atrophy or Loss of Function in Individuals with Acute Spinal Cord Injury: A Pilot Study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 2023. 104(6): p. 909917.
15. Lawrason, S.V.C. and K.A. Martin Ginis, Evaluating the Feasibility, Acceptability, and Engagement of an Health Physical Activity Intervention for Adults With Spinal Cord Injury Who Walk: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Sport Exerc Psychol, 2023. 45(2): p. 61-76.
16. Maher, J.L., et al., Feasibility study of high-intensity interval training to reduce cardiometabolic disease risks in individuals with acute spinal cord injury. BMJ Open, 2023. 13(2): p. e068507.
17. Engsberg, J.R., et al., Cervical spine motion during extrication. The Journal of Emergency Medicine, 2013. 44(1): p. 122-127.
18. Abramowicz, A.E. and M. Bustillo, Anesthesia for cervical spinal cord injury. Anesthesia for Trauma: New Evidence and New Challenges, 2014: p. 167-192.
19. Cerillo, J.L., et al., Spine Bracing: When to Utilize—A Narrative Review. Biomechanics, 2023. 3(1): p. 136-154.
20. Payne, J.M., et al., Satisfaction with Life is Similar Between People with Nontraumatic Spinal Cord Injury and Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury. American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 2006. 85(3): p. 252.
21. Hagan, M.J., et al., Influence of Sociodemographic and Psychosocial Factors on Length of Stay After Surgical Management of Traumatic Spine Fracture with Spinal Cord Injury. World Neurosurgery, 2022. 166: p. e859-e871.
22. Krassioukov, A., et al., A systematic review of the management of orthostatic hypotension after spinal cord injury. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation, 2009. 90(5): p. 876-885.
23. Barbeau, H., S. Nadeau, and C. Garneau, Physical determinants, emerging concepts, and training approaches in gait of individuals with spinal cord injury. Journal of Neurotrauma, 2006. 23(3-4): p. 571-585.
24. Lee, S., et al., Central neuropathic pain in spinal cord injury. Critical Reviews™ in Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, 2013. 25(3-4).
