The Effectiveness of Incorporating Video Conversations in an EFL University Classroom for Promoting Oral Communication Skills
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59992/IJSR.2025.v4n11p8Keywords:
Oral Communication, Teaching Technology, Video Conversation Practice, Fluency, Educational InnovationAbstract
This study explores the impact of technology-enhanced instruction, specifically video conversation practices, on the oral communication skills of first-year university students learning English as a Foreign Language (EFL). Over an 8-week period, a quasi-experimental mixed-methods design was implemented using the textbook Person to Person 1 as the core instructional material. Participants engaged in both traditional textbook activities and supplementary video-based conversation tasks. Data collection included pre- and post-speaking tests. Quantitative results from the speaking assessments revealed significant improvements in students’ oral fluency, pronunciation accuracy, and overall communicative confidence. The post-test scores demonstrated marked progress compared to the pre-test, indicating that the integration of video conversation tools contributed positively to language development. Qualitative feedback further supported these findings, with students reporting increased motivation, engagement, and a sense of autonomy in their learning process.
The video-based practices enriched textbook-driven instruction by fostering interactive learning environments, enabling real-time feedback, and encouraging peer collaboration. These digital tools allowed learners to practice speaking in more authentic and dynamic contexts, bridging the gap between classroom exercises and real-world communication.The study highlights the pedagogical benefits of combining traditional language resources with modern communication technologies. It recommends that EFL curricula be updated to incorporate video conversation practices as a core component of oral skills development. Such integration not only enhances linguistic outcomes but also prepares students for the communicative demands of a digitally connected world.
References
1. Ahmed, K., & Zhao, Y. (2023). Immersive learning through VR: Assessing EFL speaking accuracy and spontaneity. TESOL Quarterly, 57(1), 91–109. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.325.
2. Albobdair, Mohammed Hasan Mahdi H.: (2021) ‘Developing Iraqi EFL Secondary School Students' Oral Communication Skills’. HNSJ Humanitarian & Natural Sciences Journal. ISSN: (e) 2709-0833. www.hnjournal.net.
3. Burns, A., & Richards, J. C. (2002). Person to Person 1: Communicative speaking and listening skills. Oxford University Press.
4. Burns, A., & Richards, J. C. (2002). Person to Person 1: Communicative speaking and listening skills. Oxford University Press.
5. Canale, Michael (1980). "Theoretical Bases of Communicative Approaches to Second Language Teaching and Testing". Applied Linguistics 1 (1).
6. Chapelle, C. A. (2003). English language learning and technology: Lectures on applied linguistics in the age of information. John Benjamins Publishing
7. Gass, S. M., & Selinker, L. (2008). Second language acquisition: An introductory course (3rd ed.). Routledge.
8. Gass, S. M., & Selinker, L. (2008). Second language acquisition: An introductory course (3rd ed.). Routledge.
9. Hymes, D.H. (1972) On Communicative Competence In: J.B. Pride and J. Holmes (eds) Sociolinguistics. Selected Readings. Harmondsworth: Penguin, pp. 269-293. (Part 2).
10. Kazemi, A. and Narafshan, M. H. (201). Technology and English Language Teaching (ELT). Advances in Language and Literary Studies. Vol. 5 No. 6; December 2014. Doi:10.7575/aiac.alls.v.5n.6p.60.
11. Liu, S., Zhang, Y., & Chang, J. (2022). The impact of AI-driven pronunciation tools on EFL learners’ oral fluency. Journal of Language and Technology, 19(3), 145–162- Wang, Q., & Vásquez, C. (2021). Gamification in EFL classrooms: A longitudinal study of.
12. Liu, S., Zhang, Y., & Chang, J. (2022). The impact of AI-driven pronunciation tools on EFL learners’ oral fluency. Journal of Language and Technology, 19(3), 145–162.
13. Meskill, C. (1996) Computers, Creativity and Communicative Competence: An Association Machine. Computer Assisted Language Learning Journal. 9, 2, 115-123.
14. Quist, G 2013 Reading With My Eyes Open: Embracing the Critical and the Personal in Language Pedagogy. London: Ubiquity Press. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/baj.
15. Suseno, Edy and Darma, Ikip Widya: (2024): Enhancing Speaking Skill Through Youtube: Systematic Literature Review. Innovare Journal of Social Sciences. Vol 12, Issue 1.
16. Van Ginkel, S., Gulikers, J., Biemans, H., & Mulder, M. (2020). Fostering oral presentation competence in higher education: Feedback effectiveness on students’ self-assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 45(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2019.1608901.
17. Wang, W. et al (2024). Speaking accuracy and fluency among EFL learners: The role of creative thinking, emotional intelligence, and academic enthusiasm. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e37620.
18. Warschauer, M., & Meskill, C. (2000). Technology and teaching English language learners. Language Learning & Technology, 4(2), 57–71.
19. Yan, W., Lowell, V.L. & Yang, L. Developing English language learners’ speaking skills through applying a situated learning approach in VR-enhanced learning experiences. Virtual Reality 28, 167 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-024-01061-5.
