Assessing Project Management Maturity in Saudi Contracting Firms and Its Influence on Urban Project Delivery Efficiency: A Field Study in the Context of Vision 2030
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59992/IJSR.2026.v5n1p2Keywords:
Project Management Maturity, Project Efficiency, Saudi Contracting, Vision 2030, Project Management Institute (PMI), Contextual Adaptation, Integrative ModelAbstract
This study aimed to develop an adaptation model for assessing Project Management Maturity (PMM) in medium and large Saudi contracting firms and to test its impact on the efficiency of urban project delivery within the context of Vision 2030. The theoretical framework was based on the ten principles of the Project Management Institute (PMI) from the PMBOK® Guide Seventh Edition, proposing a "Layered Adaptation Model" that categorizes principles into universal, adaptable, and foundational. Employing a quantitative methodology, a contextually adapted questionnaire was distributed to a stratified random sample of 285 project managers and practitioners in the contracting sector. Statistical analysis results (Multiple Regression, Correlation Coefficient) revealed a statistically significant positive relationship between the level of project management maturity (overall score and sub-dimensions) and efficiency indicators (adherence to schedule, budget, and output quality), with a correlation coefficient of (r = 0.74). Regression analysis showed that the "adaptable" dimension (e.g., principles of leadership, steering, and adaptability) had the greatest impact (β = 0.41). The results also indicated statistically significant differences in favor of large companies in overall maturity levels. The study proposes a practical integrative model consisting of a diagnostic mechanism (self-assessment tool) and a graduated development roadmap. The study concludes that the contextualized and principled adoption of global project management standards, not literal application, is the critical factor in enhancing project efficiency. It recommends the adoption of this model by regulatory bodies and contracting companies to better align with the strategic objectives of Vision 2030.
References
• العطاس، ع.، والغامدي، خ. (2020). معوقات تطبيق معايير إدارة المشاريع الاحترافية (PMI) في المشاريع الإنشائية السعودية. مجلة الإدارة والاقتصاد، 45(2)، 112-130.
• الرشيد، م.، والسليم، أ. (2019). أثر الثقافة التنظيمية على نجاح مشاريع التشييد في المملكة العربية السعودية. المجلة العربية للإدارة، 39(1)، 75-94.
• حيدر، ع. (2018) نضج إدارة المشاريع وأثره على أداء المشاريع الإنشائية. دار الجامعة الجديدة.
• Al Shaar, E. M., Khattab, S. A., & Alkaied, R. N. (2015). The effect of organizational culture on the adoption of project management methodology: Evidence from Jordan. International Journal of Project Management, 33(7), 1444-1454.
• Bent, J. A. (2006). The P3M3 model: A guide to the portfolio, programme and project management maturity model. The Stationery Office.
• Cooke-Davies, T. J. (2004). Project management maturity models. In P. W. G. Morris & J. K. Pinto (Eds.), The Wiley guide to managing projects (pp. 1234-1255). Wiley.
• Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture's consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.
• Paulk, M. C., Curtis, B., Chrissis, M. B., & Weber, C. V. (1993). Capability maturity model for software, version 1.1 (Technical Report CMU/SEI-93-TR-024). Software Engineering Institute.
• Project Management Institute. (2013). Organizational project management maturity model (OPM3) (3rd ed.). Project Management Institute.
• Project Management Institute. (2021). A guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK guide) (7th ed.). Project Management Institute.
• Saudi Vision 2030. (2016). Vision Realization Programs. Retrieved from https://www.vision2030.gov.sa.
• Turner, R., & Zolin, R. (2012). Forecasting success on large projects: Developing reliable scales to predict multiple perspectives by multiple stakeholders over multiple time frames. Project Management Journal, 43(5), 87-99.
