Sociology of Everyday Life: The Masjid’s Role in Muslims Lives - Applying Garfinkel’s Ethnomethodology
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59992/IJSR.2024.v3n4p7Keywords:
Masjid, Ethnomethodology, Religious Practices, Baraka, MuslimsAbstract
This paper utilizes Garfinkel’s ethnomethodology to investigate the role of the ‘Masjid’ in the lives of Muslims, focusing on how religious practices, particularly the concept of ‘Baraka’, influence individual experiences within the Masjid. Employing both descriptive and analytical approaches, it explores the multifaceted meanings of Islamic rituals and their impact on daily life, highlighting the Masjid’s significance beyond mere worship. By delving into the practical methods through which Muslims engage with religious spaces, this research reveals the intricate interplay between social order, cultural identity, and spiritual fulfilment. Ultimately, it emphasizes the importance of recognizing religious spaces in fostering community cohesion and individual well-being, advocating for further exploration of Muslim experience within the Masjid through an ethnomethodological lens.
References
1. Abdel-Hady, Z. (2010). The masjid, yesterday and today.
2. Aguirre, B. E., Wenger, D., & Vigo, G. (1998). A test of the emergent norm theory of collective behavior. Sociological Forum, 13, 301–320.
3. Ahmed, A.-A. (2016). Sacred rhythms: An ethnography of a Cardiff mosque [PhD Thesis]. Cardiff University.
4. Bacchetta, P. (2000). Sacred Space in Conflict in India: The Babri Masjid Affair. Growth and Change, 31(2), 255–284. https://doi.org/10.1111/0017-4815.00128.
5. Besecke, K. (2005). Seeing invisible religion: Religion as a societal conversation about transcendent meaning. Sociological Theory, 23(2), 179–196.
6. Burns, S. L. (2012). ‘Lecturing’s Work’: A Collaborative Study with Harold Garfinkel. Human Studies, 35, 175–192.
7. Button, G. (1991). Ethnomethodology and the human sciences. Cambridge University Press.
8. Chomsky, N. (2015). Powers and prospects: Reflections on nature and the social order. Haymarket Books+ ORM.
9. Chopra, R. (2008). The Cyber Presence of Babri Masjid: History, Politics and Difference in Online Indian Islam. Economic and Political Weekly, 47–56.
10. Colson, E. (2002). Tradition and Contract: The Problem of Social Order. Transaction Publishers.
11. Cooley, C. H. (1902). Human nature and the social order. Transaction Publishers.
12. Coulon, A. (1995). Ethnomethodology (Vol. 36). Sage.
13. Edmonds, J. (2019). Smelling Baraka: Everyday Islam and Islamic Normativity. American Journal of Islam and Society, 36(3), 21–48.
14. Elefson, T. P. (2008). Transactions for blessing (baraka): An ethnography of socio-religio-political power among men in the Santri Islam region of Java. Fuller Theological Seminary, School of Intercultural Studies.
15. Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in. Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
16. Garfinkel, H. (1990). The curious seriousness of professional sociology. Réseaux. Communication-Technologie-Société, 8(1), 69–78.
17. Garfinkel, H. (1996). Ethnomethodology’s program. Social Psychology Quarterly, 59(1), 5–21.
18. Garfinkel, H. (2002). Ethnomethodology’s program: Working out Durkheim’s aphorism. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
19. Garfinkel, H., Rawls, A., & Lemert, C. C. (2015). Seeing Sociologically (0 ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315632186
20. Geertz, C. (1971). Islam observed: Religious development in Morocco and Indonesia (Vol. 37). University of Chicago press.
21. Granovetter, M. (1978). Threshold models of collective behavior. American Journal of Sociology, 83(6), 1420–1443.
22. Johnstone, R. L. (2016). Religion in society: A sociology of religion (8th ed). Routledge.
23. Khan, A. K. (2008). What you will see inside a mosque. Skylight Paths Publishing.
24. Kirmani, N. (2016). Questioning the ‘Muslim woman’: Identity and insecurity in an urban Indian locality. Routledge.
25. Lynch, M. (2022). Garfinkel’s studies of work. The Ethnomethodology Program: Legacies and Prospects, 114–137.
26. Mughal, M. A. Z. (2015). An anthropological perspective on the mosque in Pakistan. Asian Anthropology, 14(2), 166–181. https://doi.org/10.1080/1683478X.2015.1055543
27. Muukkonen, M. (2008). Continuing validity of the collective behavior approach. Sociology Compass, 2(5), 1553–1564.
28. Park, R. E. (1927). Human nature and collective behavior. American Journal of Sociology, 32(5), 733–741.
29. Rawls, A. (2003). Harold Garfinkel. The Blackwell Companion to Major Contemporary Social Theorists, 122–153.
30. Rawls, A. W. (2008). Harold Garfinkel, Ethnomethodology and Workplace Studies. Organization Studies, 29(5), 701–732. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840608088768
31. Reda, N. (2004). Women in the Mosque: Historical Perspectives on Segregation. American Journal of Islam and Society, 21(2), 77–97. https://doi.org/10.35632/ajis.v21i2.504
32. Stringer, M. D. (2005). A sociological history of Christian worship. Cambridge University Press.
33. ten Have, P. (2016). Ethnomethodology. In K. B. Jensen, E. W. Rothenbuhler, J. D. Pooley, & R. T. Craig (Eds.), The International Encyclopedia of Communication Theory and Philosophy (1st ed., pp. 1–12). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118766804.wbiect010
34. Thiessen, J., & McAlpine, B. (2013). Sacred space: Function and mission from a sociological and theological perspective. International Journal for the Study of the Christian Church, 13(2), 133–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/1474225X.2013.781911
35. Trace, C. B. (2016). Ethnomethodology: Foundational insights on the nature and meaning of documents in everyday life. Journal of Documentation.
36. Woodlock, R. (2010). The masjid is for men: Competing voices in the debate about Australian Muslim women’s access to mosques. Islam and Christian–Muslim Relations, 21(1), 51–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/09596410903481853
37. Zimmerman, D. H., & Wieder, D. L. (2017). Ethnomethodology and the problem of order: Comment on Denzin. In Everyday Life (pp. 285–298). Routledge.
