A Proposed Framework for the Governance of Continuous Improvement in Saudi Training Institutions in Light of Total Quality Management: A Desk-Based Documentary Study

Authors

  • Omar Saleem Al-Maghthawi Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59992/IJESA.2026.v5n11p1

Keywords:

Continuous Improvement Governance, Total Quality Management, Saudi Training Institutions, Institutional Governance, Training Quality Assurance

Abstract

This study aimed to develop a proposed framework for governing continuous improvement in Saudi training institutions in light of Total Quality Management (TQM). It examined the theoretical and conceptual foundations, relevant regulatory and standards-based frameworks, and reference practices to derive governance requirements and implementation and evaluation mechanisms. The study adopted a comparative desk-based documentary approach involving the review, analysis, and comparison of relevant literature and documents, with particular attention to their functions, levels of application, and transferability to the Saudi context. The findings indicate that continuous improvement governance involves integrating clearly defined authorities and responsibilities, evidence-informed decision-making, professional participation, and organizational learning. The comparative analysis also identified differences between national and international frameworks, while highlighting opportunities for their context-sensitive integration. Accordingly, six categories of governance requirements were derived: leadership, organizational, procedural, human, technological, and oversight-related. A proposed framework comprising five interrelated components was developed, supported by mechanisms for implementation, monitoring, evaluation, and sustainability. The study recommends clarifying governance responsibilities, linking improvement decisions to verifiable evidence and outcomes, and subjecting the proposed framework to further regulatory review and empirical validation.

Author Biography

  • Omar Saleem Al-Maghthawi

    Master’s Researcher in Educational Administration and Leadership, Department of Educational Policy and Economics, College of Education, Taibah University, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

References

المراجع العربية:

- العتيبي، سارة ذعار، والمبيريك، هيفاء بنت فهد. (2023). متطلبات تطبيق منهجية التحسين المستمر في إدارات التدريب التربوي. مجلة الفنون والأدب وعلوم الإنسانيات والاجتماع، (96)، 175–191. https://doi.org/10.33193/JALHSS.96.2023.913

- هيئة تقويم التعليم والتدريب. (د. ت.). المركز الوطني لتقويم واعتماد التدريب.https://etec.gov.sa/centers/nctea

- هيئة تقويم التعليم والتدريب. (2026) النموذج المرجعي. https://www.etec.gov.sa/ar/referenceModel

- وكالة الأنباء السعودية. (2025، 5 فبراير). هيئة تقويم التعليم والتدريب تطلق البرنامج الوطني لتقويم التدريب. https://www.spa.gov.sa/N2256130

المراجع الأجنبية:

- Abd Rahman, N. H., Zubairi, Y. Z., Jani, R., Abdul Batau, M. F., & Shamsudheen, M. I. (2025). Governance structures and systemic challenges shaping the future of the technical and vocational education and training (TVET) workforce. Education + Training. https://doi.org/10.1108/ET-11-2024-0508

- Al-miman, M. A. (2018). Shared governance: Determining faculty members’ current level of participation in institutional decision making in Shaqra University and TVTC. International Journal of Educational Administration and Policy Studies, 10(10), 135–147. https://doi.org/10.5897/IJEAPS2018.0560

- Alzamil, Z. A. (2014). Quality improvement of technical education in Saudi Arabia: Self-evaluation perspective. Quality Assurance in Education, 22(2), 125–144. https://doi.org/10.1108/QAE-12-2011-0073

- Bessant, J., Caffyn, S., & Gallagher, M. (2001). An evolutionary model of continuous improvement behaviour. Technovation, 21(2), 67–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4972(00)00023-7

- Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027

- Dean, J. W., Jr., & Bowen, D. E. (1994). Management theory and total quality: Improving research and practice through theory development. Academy of Management Review, 19(3), 392–418. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1994.9412271803

- Dieltiens, V., & Engelbrecht, B. (2025). Governing technical and vocational education and training: Efficiency and accountability in the form and function of college councils. Journal of Vocational, Adult and Continuing Education and Training, 8(1), Article 19. https://doi.org/10.14426/jovacet.v8i1.509

- Duemmler, K., & Caprani, I. (2026). Assuring workplace training quality in firms: Insights into the work of inspectors in the dual Swiss VET system. Journal of Vocational Education & Training, 78(2), 311–330. https://doi.org/10.1080/13636820.2025.2543594

- European Commission. (n.d.). EQAVET framework. https://employment-social-affairs.ec.europa.eu/policies-and-activities/skills-and-qualifications/working-together/eqavet-european-quality-assurance-vocational-education-and-training/about-eqavet/eqavet-framework_en

- International Organization for Standardization. (2025). Educational organizations—Management systems for educational organizations—Requirements with guidance for use (ISO Standard No. 21001:2025). https://www.iso.org/standard/21001

- International Organization for Standardization. (2026). Quality management principles: Your foundation for success (3rd ed.). https://www.iso.org/publication/PUB100080.html

- Krooi, M., Whittingham, J., & Beausaert, S. (2024). Introducing the 3P conceptual model of internal quality assurance in higher education: A systematic literature review. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 82, Article 101360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2024.101360

- Mende, C., Oswald-Egg, M. E., & Caves, K. (2025). Vocational education and training (VET) system governance: A systematic literature review. Journal of Vocational Education & Training, 77(5), 1419–1453. https://doi.org/10.1080/13636820.2025.2461586

- Morgan, H. (2022). Conducting a qualitative document analysis. The Qualitative Report, 27(1), 64–77. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2022.5044

- Saraph, J. V., Benson, P. G., & Schroeder, R. G. (1989). An instrument for measuring the critical factors of quality management. Decision Sciences, 20(4), 810–829. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.1989.tb01421.x

- Song, J. (2025). Research on the optimization path of organizational model and governance structure adaptability for industry-education integration in vocational colleges. Creative Education, 16(12), 2053–2065. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2025.1612124

Downloads

Published

2026-11-03

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

A Proposed Framework for the Governance of Continuous Improvement in Saudi Training Institutions in Light of Total Quality Management: A Desk-Based Documentary Study. (2026). The International Journal of Educational Sciences and Arts, 5(11). https://doi.org/10.59992/IJESA.2026.v5n11p1