A Note on the Validity of Metaphor Universality
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59992/IJESA.2023.v2n8p1Keywords:
Metaphor Universality, cultural-specific metaphors, Conceptual Metaphor Theory, Arabic metaphorsAbstract
Metaphor universality has been a topic of long debate among interested researchers. A byproduct of claiming the universality of metaphors is admitting a common human cognition. This cognition is based on different factors external to the cognition itself. In the present study, metaphors from Arabic tweets were analyzed and compared to metaphors in English found in published research. Based on this comparison, it was concluded that metaphors are universal and culturally specific at two different levels. On one level, the shared human anatomy poses universality, and on the other level, factors working against such universality affect the cultural specificity of metaphors. Kövecses (2010b) proposes a list of factors including awareness of context, differential memory, differential concerns and interests, differential cognitive preference and styles, and creativity. Considering languages other than Arabic and English in the comparison can be a promising future research.
References
• Al-Abed Al-Haq, F., & El-Sharif, A. (2008). A comparative study for the metaphors use in happiness and anger in English and Arabic. US-China Foreign Language, 6(11), 1-19.
• Almaany Aljam’i dictionary. قاموس ومعجم المعاني متعدد اللغات والمجالات - قاموس عربي عربي و قاموس عربي انجليزي ثنائي. Retrieved November 26, 2017, from http://www.almaany.com/
• Bernárdez, E. (2013). On the cultural character of metaphor: some reflections on universality and culture-specificity in the language and cognition of time, especially in Amerindian languages. Review of Cognitive Linguistics. Published under the auspices of the Spanish Cognitive Linguistics Association, 11(1), 1-35.
• Dirven, René. 1994. Metaphor and Nation: Metaphors Afrikaners Live By. Frankfurt/ Main: Peter Lang.
• El Refaie, E. (2014). Appearances and dis/dys-appearances: A dynamic view of embodiment in Conceptual Metaphor Theory. Metaphor and the Social World, 4(1), 109-125.
• Geeraerts, D., & Gevaert, C. (2008). Hearts and (angry) minds in Old English. Culture, body, and language: Conceptualizations of internal body organs across cultures and languages, 319-347.
• Geeraerts, D., & Grondelears. S. (1995). Looking back at anger: Cultural traditions and metaphorical patterns1. Language and the Cognitive Construal of the World, 82, 153.
• Kövecses, Z. (2000). The concept of anger: Universal or culture specific? Psychopathology, 33(4), 159-170.
• Kövecses, Z. (2005). Metaphor in culture: Universality and variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Kövecses, Z. (2008). Conceptual metaphor theory: Some criticisms and alternative proposals. Annual review of cognitive linguistics, 6(1), 168-184.
• Kövecses, Z. (2010a). Metaphor: A practical introduction. New York, Oxford University Press.
• Kövecses, Z. (2010b). A new look at metaphorical creativity in cognitive linguistics. Cognitive linguistics, 21(4), 663-697.
• Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980, 2003). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the Flesh (Vol. 4). New York: Basic books.
• Langacker, R., & Langacker, R. W. (2008). Cognitive grammar: A basic introduction. New York: Oxford University Press.
• Maalej, Z. (2007). Doing critical discourse analysis with the contemporary theory of metaphor: Towards a discourse model of metaphor. Cognitive linguistics in critical discourse analysis: Application and theory, 132-158.
• MacArthur, F. (2005). The competent horseman in a horseless world: Observations on a conventional metaphor in Spanish and English. Metaphor and Symbol, 20(1), 71-94.
• McMullen, L. M., & Conway, J. B. (2002). Conventional metaphors for depression. The verbal communication of emotions: Interdisciplinary perspectives, 167-181.
• Rodriguez, I. L. (2009). Of women, bitches, chickens and vixens: Animal metaphors for women in English and Spanish. Cultura, lenguaje y representación: revista de estudios culturales de la Universitat Jaume I, 7, 77-100.
• Twitter basic search. Retrieved August 16, 2018, from: http://twitter.com/search.
• Wang, H., Runtsova, T., & Chen, H. (2013). Economy is an organism–a comparative study of metaphor in English and Russian economic discourse. Text & talk, 33(2), 259-288.
• Yu, N. (1995). Metaphorical expressions of anger and happiness in English and Chinese. Metaphor and symbol, 10(2), 59-92.
• Steen G., Aletta D., Herrmann B, Kaal A., Krennmayr T., & Pasma T. (2010). A method for linguistic metaphor identification: From MIP to MIPVU (Vol. 14). John Benjamins Publishing.
