A Human Being and the Ecology of Digital Media: The Implication of Social Media on the Thought and Expression of a Human Being
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59992/IJESA.2024.v3n8p2Keywords:
Media Ecology, Digital Media, Social MediaAbstract
This paper seeks, using the interpretive philosophical approach, to look into the issue of the impact of digital media on human life and ways of thinking and expression. This paper aims to analyze this issue interpretatively and link it to historical transformations in the field of media ecology in order to adopt a forward-looking view instead of a numerical analysis of the available information. The issue, as this paper sees it, lacks the philosophical dimension to discuss the characteristics of social media and link changes that these social media have brought on humans with changes that humans have brought on various concepts such as culture, thought, and society. This paper concluded that social media are a different revolution in communication media. It changed the procedures of the communication process, bringing the margin groups into the position of the elites and returning the elites to a position that is close to the position of the margin groups. The margins have become the agent that determines the ways of building new social relationships and carries out the process of transforming from traditional relationships to digital relationships. Thus, concepts change and are shaped by a different perception (the margin group). By carefully reading the characteristics of three social media (Twitter, Facebook, and WhatsApp), three common characteristics and features emerged that shaped and influenced their users: openness, permanence and continuity, and changing concepts.
References
1. الجاحظ. الحيوان. تحقيق عبدالسلام هارون، شركة ومطبعة مصطفى البابي الحلبي وأولاده بمصر، ١٩٦٥.
2. Arendt, Hannah. (1998). the Human Condition. Translated by Margaret Canovan, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
3. Bazarova, Natalya N., and Yoon Hyung Choi. “Self-Disclosure in Social Media: Extending the Functional Approach to Disclosure Motivations and Characteristics on Social Network Sites.” Journal of Communication, vol. 64, no. 4, Aug. 2014, pp. 635–657.
4. Chan-Olmsted, Sylvia M., Cho, Moohee, & Lee, Sangwon. (2013). User Perceptions of Social Media: A Comparative Study of Perceived Characteristics and User Profiles by Social Media. Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, 3(4), 149-178.
5. Charoensukmongkol, Peerayuth. (2018). The Impact of Social Media on Social Comparison and Envy in Teenagers: The Moderating Role of the Parent Comparing Children and In Group Competition among Friends. Journal of Child & Family Studies, 27(1), 69–79.
6. Facebook.com
7. Habermas, Jürgen. (1991). the Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Bourgeois Society. Translated by Thomas Burger, The MIT Press, Cambridge.
8. Hunt, Melissa G., Marx, Rachel, Lipson, Courtney, & Young, Jordyn. (2018). No More Fomo: Limiting Social Media Decreases Loneliness and Depression. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 37(10), 751-768.
9. Joo, Tang-Mui. & Chan-Eang Teng. (2017). Impacts of Social Media (Facebook) on Human Communication and Relationships: A View on Behavioral Change and Social Unity. International Journal of Knowledge Content Development & Technology, 7(4), 27-50.
10. Lin, TrishaT. C., Chiu, Vicki, & Lim, Wendy. (2011). Factors Affecting the Adoption of Social Network Sites: Examining Four Adopter Categories of Singapore’s Working Adults. Asian Journal of Communication, 21(3), 221–242.
11. McCulloch, Gretchen. (2019). Because Internet: Understanding the New Rules of Language. Riverhead Books.
12. Nye, David. (2006). Technology Matters: Questions to Live with. The MIT Press.
13. Ong, Walter J. (2002). Orality and Literacy: The Technologizing of the Word. Routledge.
14. The Presence of the Word: Some Prolegomena for Cultural and Religious History. New Haven and London, Yale University Press, 1967.
15. Palmer, Richard E. (1969). Hermeneutics: Interpretation Theory in Schleiermacher, Dilthey, Heidegger, and Gadamer. Northwestern University Press.
16. Postman, Neil. (1992). Technopoly: The Surrender of Culture to Technology. Vintage Books.
17. Shlain, Leonard. The Alphabet versus the Goddess: The Conflict between Word and Image. Viking, 1998.
18. Swingle, Mari K. (2016). I-Minds: How Cell Phones, Computers, Gaming, and Social Media are changing Our Brains, Our Behavior, and the Evolution of Our Species. New Society Publishers.
19. Twitter.com
20. Vaterlaus, J. Mitchell., Patten, Emily V., Roche, Cesia., Young, Jimmy A. (2015). #Gettinghealthy: The perceived influence of social media on young adult health behaviors. Computers in Human Behavior, 45, pp. 151-157.
21. wearesocial.com
22. Whatapp.com
23. Zolkepli, Izzal Asnira, and Yusniza Kamarulzaman. (2015). Social Media Adoption: The Role of Media Needs and Innovation Characteristics. Computers in Human Behavior, 43, 189–209.
