Impact of Professional Skepticism on Financial Statement Fraud Detection: An Empirical Study of External Auditors in Yemen
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59992/IJFAES.2026.v5n7p1Keywords:
Professional Skepticism, Detecting fraud in financial statements, External Auditors, YemenAbstract
This study investigates the impact of professional skepticism on detecting financial statement fraud from the perspective of external auditors in Yemen. A quantitative analytical approach was employed, using a questionnaire as the primary data collection tool. The study population comprised 575 external auditors, from which a purposive sample of 392 auditors from both private and public sectors was selected. A total of 223 valid questionnaires were returned, yielding a 57% response rate. Statistical analysis using SPSS revealed a significant positive impact of professional skepticism on fraud detection, indicating that higher levels of skepticism enhance auditors’ ability to identify and evaluate fraudulent practices. This underscores professional skepticism as a critical factor in improving the effectiveness of external auditing. Accordingly, the study recommends systematically integrating professional skepticism into auditing standards and procedures to strengthen audit quality and enhance fraud detection effectiveness.
References
المراجع العربية:
- أبو الخير، عمار أحمد. (2018). دور معايير المراجعة الدولية في الحد من ممارسات المحاسبة الإبداعية في القوائم المالية: دراسة ميدانية على عينة من مكاتب المراجعة الخارجية في اليمن. ]أطروحة دكتوراه غير منشورة[. جامعة النيلين. السودان.
- باسردة، علي محسن. (2017). العوامل المحددة لموقف مراجع الحسابات الخارجية من اختيارات الإدارة للسياسات المحاسبية البديلة في اليمن: دراسة ميدانية. ]أطروحة دكتوراه غير منشورة[. جامعة السودان للعلوم والتكنولوجيا. الخرطوم. السودان.
- الجهاز المركزي للرقابة والمحاسبة. (2022). التقرير السنوي عن نتائج مراجعة الحسابات ووحدات القطاع العام. الجمهورية اليمنية.http://coca.gov.ye/QMG
- الزبيدي، غازي فهد. (2020). الخصائص السلوكية للمراجع الخارجي وأثرها في كشف الاحتيال المالي المعقد: دراسة مقارنة. المجلة العربية للمحاسبة، 23(2)، 112-140.
- شحاتة، شحاتة السيد. (2021). أثر الشك المهني للمراجع الخارجي على الحد من مخاطر اختراق القوائم المالية في ظل بيئة التشغيل الإلكتروني: دراسة تطبيقية. المجلة العلمية للدراسات التجارية والبيئية، 12(2)، 150-185.
- شحاتة، مسعود زين العابدين، وطيبي، حمزة. (2021). تحديد وتقييم المراجع الخارجي لمخاطر التحريفات الجوهرية باستخدام الشك المهني. مجلة إدارة الأعمال والدراسات الاقتصادية، 7(2)، 479-496.
- علقم، محمد أحمد، وعلي، هيثم يوسف، والهمشري، ياسر محمد. (2021). علاقة الشك المهني بمخاطر المراجعة والرقابة الداخلية واكتشاف الغش والأخطاء الجوهرية في البيانات المالية في الأردن. المجلة الأكاديمية للدراسات متعددة التخصصات، 10(2)، 105-117.
- العنزي، محمد نايف. (2022). دور الشك المهني في تعزيز كفاءة المراجعين في رصد المؤشرات التحذيرية للاحتيال المالي: دراسة ميدانية في البيئة الخليجية. مجلة الدراسات المحاسبية والمالية المتقدمة، 7(1)، 45-78.
- القباطي، صبحي سعيد علي. (2017). تطور واتجاه الشك المهني في عملية المراجعة في ظل طريقة المعرفة التي سوف يتبعها المراجع. المجلة العلمية للدراسات التجارية والبيئية، 8(3)، 581-608.
- الوشلي، أكرم محمد. (2010). مدى استجابة خطط المراجعة لمخاطر غش الإدارة في ضوء المتطلبات الحديثة لمعايير المراجعة: دراسة ميدانية. في الندوة الثانية عشرة لسبل تطوير المحاسبة في المملكة العربية السعودية. جامعة الملك سعود، السعودية.
المراجع الأجنبية:
- Al-Sorihi, S. (2014). The association of external auditors’ attributes with management fraud risk assessment in financial reporting: Empirical evidence from Yemen [Doctoral dissertation]. Universiti Utara Malaysia.
- American Institute of Certified Public Accountants [AICPA]. (2002). Audit and accounting guide: Audits of nonpublic companies. AICPA.
- American Institute of Certified Public Accountants [AICPA]. (2006). Consideration of fraud in a financial statement audit (AU Section 316). AICPA.
- Association of Certified Fraud Examiners [ACFE]. (2022). Report to the nations: Global study on occupational fraud and abuse. ACFE.
- Association of Certified Fraud Examiners [ACFE]. (2024). Report to the nations on occupational fraud and abuse: Government edition. ACFE. https://www.acfe.com/report-to-the-nation/2024/
- Bajaj, D., Patil, D., & Madhavi, P. (2024). A study on evolution of Adani Group of industries: Its resilience in Indian industries. Involvement International Journal of Business, 1, 129–141.
- Bhardwaj, A., & Ameli, F. (2018). The role of professional skepticism in fraud detection: A review. International Journal of Accounting and Financial Reporting, 8(4), 1–15.
- Chenhall, R. H. (2003). Management control systems design within its organizational context: Findings from contingency-based research and directions for the future. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 28(2-3), 127–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-3682(01)00027-7
- Ciołek, M. (2017). Professional skepticism in auditing: The role of auditor’s characteristics. Journal of Economics and Management, 28(2), 23–35.
- Cressey, D. R. (1953). Other people's money: A study in the social psychology of embezzlement. Free Press.
- Dewi, N. S., et al. (2023). Professional skepticism and self-efficacy on fraud detection. In Building a Sustainable Future (pp. 357–368).
- Etikan, I., Musa, S., & Alkassim, R. (2016). Comparison of convenience and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1–4.
- Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. C. (1983). Separation of ownership and control. The Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2), 301–325. https://doi.org/10.1086/467037
- Feng, Y., & Chen, C. (2021). The impact of financial fraud on financial risk: A case study of Luckin Coffee. Advances in Economics, Business and Management Research, 190.
- Fiedler, F. E. (1964). A contingency model of leadership effectiveness. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 1, 149–190.
- Fuller, S. H. (2015). The influence of professional skepticism on fraud risk assessments. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 34(3), 280–300.
- Fullerton, R., & Durtschi, C. (2004). The effect of professional skepticism on fraud detection skills [Master’s thesis]. Utah State University.
- Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Pearson.
- Healy, P. M., & Palepu, K. G. (2001). Information asymmetry, corporate disclosure, and capital markets: A review of the empirical disclosure literature. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 31(1-3), 405–440.
- Healy, P. M., & Palepu, K. G. (2003). The fall of Enron. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 17(2), 3–26.
- Hurtt, R. K. (2010). Development of a scale to measure professional skepticism. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 29(1), 149–171.
- Hurtt, R. K., Brown-Liburd, H. L., Earley, C. E., & Krishnamoorthy, G. (2013). Auditor professional skepticism: Literature synthesis. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 32(Supplement 1), 45–97.
- International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board [IAASB]. (2015). ISA 240: The auditor’s responsibilities relating to fraud in an audit of financial statements. IAASB.
- International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board [IAAS]. (2021). Handbook of international auditing standards. IAASB.
- International Federation of Accountants [IFAC]. (2016). ISA 240: Auditor’s responsibilities relating to fraud. IFAC.
- International Federation of Accountants [IFAC]. (2020). Professional skepticism guidance. IFAC.
- International Federation of Accountants [IFAC]. (2024). International standard on auditing 200, 240, 330, 500, 505. IFAC.
- Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360.
- Kwocka, I., Mathieu, L., & Narayanaswamy, R. (2016). Internal auditors’ skepticism. Journal of Accounting Research, 54(1), 199–234.
- Lokanan, M. (2015). Challenges to fraud detection. Journal of Financial Crime, 22(4).
- Masood, A. (2020). Audit expectation gap in Yemen. SMART Journal of Business Management Studies, 16(2), 19–29.
- Moyes, G., et al. (2009). Effectiveness of auditing standards. International Business & Economics Research Journal, 8, 1–17.
- Nelson, M. W. (2009). A model and literature review of professional skepticism in auditing. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 28(2), 1–34.
- Nolder, C. J., & Kadous, K. (2018). Grounding the professional skepticism construct in multi-disciplinary literature: A framework for understanding and promoting skeptical concepts and behaviors. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 67, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2018.03.010
- Nusa, I. B. S. (2021). Professional skepticism and fraud detection. Enrichment: Journal of Management, 12(1), 490–498.
- Otley, D. T. (1980). The contingency theory of management accounting: Achievement and prognosis. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 5(4), 413–428. https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-3682(80)90040-9
- PricewaterhouseCoopers [PwC]. (2018). Global economic crime and fraud survey 2018. https://www.pwc.com/gx/en/services/advisory/forensics/economic-crime-fraud-survey.html
- PricewaterhouseCoopers [PwC]. (2022). Global economic crime and fraud survey 2022. PwC.
- Quadackers, L. M. (2009). Auditors’ skeptical characteristics (Doctoral dissertation). Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.
- Rezaee, Z. (2005). Financial statement fraud. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 16(3), 277–298.
- Royaee, R., Salehi, M., & Arianpoor, A. (2013). Auditor independence and audit quality. Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in Business, 5(1), 1–10.
- Saputra, K. A. K., et al. (2021). Auditor skepticism. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 8(3), 123–134.
- Singleton, T. W., & Singleton, A. J. (2010). Fraud auditing and forensic accounting. Wiley.
- Sorova, A., & Dimitrova, J. (2016). Professional skepticism in auditing. Journal of Economics, 1(2), 1–17.
- Susanto, E. (2021). Auditor experience and fraud detection. Point of View Research Accounting and Auditing, 2(4), 252–261.
- Transparency International. (2023). Corruption perceptions index 2023. https://www.transparency.org/en/cpi/2023
- Watts, R. L., & Zimmerman, J. L. (1986). Positive accounting theory. Prentice-Hall.
